Re: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:32:35PM +0800, tzq tang gelenbert...@gmail.com wrote a message of 132 lines which said: I think I should explain the question more clearly, You need first to learn about email. The superior to sign is here to *quote* what you respond to. Do not use it for your

Re: XFR quota setting?

2009-03-12 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 11 2009, Niall O'Reilly wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:41 -0500, Peter Laws wrote: Seriously, though, what is the default quota and is it actually configurable? Sorry. No idea what or whether. RTFM time for us both! 8-) Which ought to take less than the time to post here :-(

Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread My Name
Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I need to change the code (all ideas where to start are welcome, I haven't looked at the code yet). I want to setup a forwarder and each incoming query (in fact only A or ) should be sent to two different upstream servers. Joe

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread R Dicaire
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:43 AM, My Name mylistuser1...@gmail.com wrote: I want to setup a forwarder and each incoming query (in fact only A or ) should be sent to two different upstream servers. Why? ___ bind-users mailing list

RE: XFR quota setting?

2009-03-12 Thread Laws, Peter C.
On Mar 11 2009, Niall O'Reilly wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:41 -0500, Peter Laws wrote: Seriously, though, what is the default quota and is it actually configurable? Sorry. No idea what or whether. RTFM time for us both! 8-) Which ought to take less than the time to post here :-(

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread Gregory Hicks
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:44 +0200 Subject: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query From: My Name mylistuser1...@gmail.com To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I need to change the code (all ideas where to start are welcome, I haven't looked at the

Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Peter Laws
Our environment includes a couple of AD servers. They serve DNS to PCs using AD (but not all PCs). They allow DDNS for clients and slave the rest of our environment's zones. For some reason, they *forward* every other query to us, but never mind that. Look it up your own damn ... well,

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 200903121454.n2cesvel019...@metis.hicks-net.net, Gregory Hicks wri tes: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:44 +0200 Subject: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query From: My Name mylistuser1...@gmail.com To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I

Re: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Kevin Darcy
Peter Laws wrote: Our environment includes a couple of AD servers. They serve DNS to PCs using AD (but not all PCs). They allow DDNS for clients and slave the rest of our environment's zones. For some reason, they *forward* every other query to us, but never mind that. Look it up your own damn

RE: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Bridges
If I dump the delegation and make an MX record in the master, mail will be OK, but then no one can query records in that zone because it's not actually delegated unless they point at MS-DNS. Is there a reason why you can't point all of your internal hosts (AD and non-AD) at your AD's for

Re: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread tzq tang
thanks for your response.I do this test between two intranet machine and each of them has a local IP.10.0.0.13,additionally the both domain are in the same DNS SERVER 10.0.0.13 ,the zone file as follows: ZONE 1: $ORIGIN . $TTL 86400 ; 1 day test.comIN SOA test.com.

Re: Trouble publishing dkim via nsupdate

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 20090313031347.ga19...@csy.ca, Shane W writes: Hey all, I am trying to publish a dkim record in a signed dynamic zone using nsupdate. My query looks like the below but nsupdate is having none of it, giving formerr. Can anyone see an obvious error with this query: Pasting the