On 30.03.10 23:23, fddi wrote:
CentOS 5.4 has bind version 9.3.6 and that's it.
Before I had a CentOS 4.0 which was still using 9.2.x
oh. Is there any possibility to upgrade centos?
And are you sure there is no possibility in upgrading BIND within centos?
Otherwise I'm afraid I can recommend
The CentOS stuff is built from RHEL sources so the basic repositories
wouldn't have a newer BIND base package than RHEL. However, as noted
previously the RHEL provided package includes backports of later BIND
base versions for bug and security fixes.
Of course you can always install a later BIND
In message 2aa71bedebcf80449e35b7b640700be42f8513a...@email4.uspto.gov, Lear
, Karen (Evolver) writes:
I'm adding a new domain to my existing authoritative name servers, and need t
o add an MX record for a device on the existing domain. That device will ser
ve both domains until we get a new
On 4/1/2010 12:37 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4bb1c63b.30...@ies.etisalat.ae, Abdulla Bushlaibi writes:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source port
are being dropped partially by the
On 3/30/2010 5:36 AM, Abdulla Bushlaibi wrote:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the
DNS service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source
port are being dropped partially by the load balancer and as per the
load balancer vendor feed back, this is
On 2010/03/31, at 04:08, Markus Feldmann wrote:
Matthew Pounsett schrieb:
On 2010/03/30, at 19:04, Markus Feldmann wrote:
Warren Kumari schrieb:
In the footer of every message lurks the following link:
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Yes ... i read this but you can not
In message 4bb4ed5a.20...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 4/1/2010 12:37 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4bb1c63b.30...@ies.etisalat.ae, Abdulla Bushlaibi writes:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple
In article mailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security practice. I
cast my vote in favor of penalizing it, in the default configuration of
any device that responds to DNS requests.
8 matches
Mail list logo
