On 22/09/10 4:14 AM, "Doug Barton" wrote:
> On 9/21/2010 7:46 AM, Kalman Feher wrote:
>> It may well be analogous to that (though I disagree), but the quote does not
>> substantiate why knowing public information is bad. In the example above,
>> you've simply saved your switchboard and the cal
On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 9/21/2010 7:46 AM, Kalman Feher wrote:
>> It may well be analogous to that (though I disagree), but the quote does not
>> substantiate why knowing public information is bad. In the example above,
>> you've simply saved your switchboard and the
On 9/21/2010 7:46 AM, Kalman Feher wrote:
It may well be analogous to that (though I disagree), but the quote does not
substantiate why knowing public information is bad. In the example above,
you've simply saved your switchboard and the caller some time. If you don't
want someone to know it, don
On 21/09/10 16:40, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
I always liken arguments such as this to a leaky boat. While one
certainly does more to eliminate the boat filling with water by plugging
the big holes that does NOT mean there is no value is caulking the small
ones. Over time enough of the small ones m
I always liken arguments such as this to a leaky boat. While one
certainly does more to eliminate the boat filling with water by plugging
the big holes that does NOT mean there is no value is caulking the small
ones. Over time enough of the small ones might be enough to swamp the
boat.
-Ori
On 21/09/10 14:43, Niobos wrote:
On 2010-09-21 15:32, Kalman Feher wrote:
On 21/09/10 8:43 AM, "Niobos" wrote:
I personally find protection against zone enumeration to be a false sense of
security. If it's public people will find it. Ask your self what it is that
you want publically accessible
On 21/09/10 3:43 PM, "Niobos" wrote:
> On 2010-09-21 15:32, Kalman Feher wrote:
>> On 21/09/10 8:43 AM, "Niobos" wrote:
>> I personally find protection against zone enumeration to be a false sense of
>> security. If it's public people will find it. Ask your self what it is that
>> you want pu
On 2010-09-21 15:32, Kalman Feher wrote:
> On 21/09/10 8:43 AM, "Niobos" wrote:
> I personally find protection against zone enumeration to be a false sense of
> security. If it's public people will find it. Ask your self what it is that
> you want publically accessible yet you don't want others to
On 21/09/10 8:43 AM, "Niobos" wrote:
> Thank you for the excellent advice!
>
> On 2010-09-20 18:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> I recommend anyone attempting to secure their DNS read the NIST Computer
>> Security Resource Center document SP800-81 Rev.1, "Secure Domain Naming
>> System (DNS) Guide
9 matches
Mail list logo
