Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence?
Someone else can probably give a more authoritative answer. My
understanding is that BIND will rotate the answers it gives out when
there's more than one similar record in a rrset. And yes, this can help
spread the load a bit.
Whether
Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which
could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading?
I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything
yet.
To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server
Bind-dlz(the latest Berkeley DB as a back-end),Services can start correctly,
but DNS is not returned to the correct value.
Related data:
dbsql .tables
dns_client dns_datadns_xfr dns_zone
dbsql select * from dns_client;
test.com|192.168.146.155
test.com|127.0.0.1
dbsql select * from
I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph
representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, philippe.simo...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hi
i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load
balancing
between 2
On 29 Sep 2010, at 09:34, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Now, I have been given 2 keys, t1 and t2, to use for transferring z1 and
z2 respectively.
[Wandering off topic, perhaps]
That seems to me a back-to-front way to do things.
If the organization running the master is
2010/9/29 Eivind Olsen eiv...@aminor.no
Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which
could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading?
I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything
yet.
To be a bit more specific -
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
BIND 9.6.0-P1
resolv.conf:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
machine is postfix MX relay-only gateway
on a separate machines, zen.dnsbld.domain.net on IPs 10.1.60.1 10.1.60.2,
rbldnsd is running a local copy of zen.spamhaus
nmap shows 10.1.60.1 and 10.1.60.2 with port 53 UDP open.
-- Original Message --
From: Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com
Reply-To: lcon...@go2france.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:13 +0200
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
BIND 9.6.0-P1
resolv.conf:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
machine is postfix MX relay-only gateway
on a
On 29/09/2010 12:09, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 29 Sep 2010, at 09:34, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Now, I have been given 2 keys, t1 and t2, to use for transferring z1 and
z2 respectively.
[Wandering off topic, perhaps]
That seems to me a back-to-front way to do things.
If
On 29 Sep 2010, at 15:53, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Anyway, I discussed this with my colleague here, and we came up with a
solution that works. We have created 2 views of the master name servers:
Nice one, and useful to have in the mailing-list archive!
/Niall
I am trying to track down a bit of strange behavior. Not sure if anyone
else sees this.
I tend to run named in the foreground and in debug level 2 for a while
after I compile it. If all looks good then I can run it as a service
daemon in the usual way.
This means I run it like so :
bash-3.00#
Hi
What I have found is that while dig +trace gets and displays the information
directly from the name servers along the way the resolver is also queried
and the resolver's result overrides the trace result. This can cause great
frustration as you see the trace looks correct but if the cache
Do you need anything other than libgssapi installed for GSS-TSIG to work. Are
any of these required as well:
cyrus-sasl-gssapi.i386 2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 rhel-x86_64-client-5
cyrus-sasl-gssapi.x86_64 2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 rhel-x86_64-client-5
libgssapi.i386
We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
business partner. Turns out they had CheckPoint firewalls with
SmartDefense turned of for DNS traffic. This was blocking traffic going
to them with DO flag enabled. I could duplicate the problem from a
command line by issuing dig
On 9/29/2010 12:37 AM, SW wrote:
Hi everyone...
I am rather new to the world of DNS so I'm hoping to get some of your
expertise...
Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence? For
example, if I assign 2 IP addresses to an A record, is it possible to
have it respond like...
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:51:55 -0400
From: Taylor, Gord gord.tay...@rbc.com
Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
business partner. Turns out they had CheckPoint firewalls with
SmartDefense turned of for
On 29/09/10 10:30 PM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:51:55 -0400
From: Taylor, Gord gord.tay...@rbc.com
Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
We recently ran into an intermittent problem sending queries to a
business partner. Turns out
Can someone explain when BIND sets DO flag and when it won't? Most of my
client workstations are XPSP3, and NONE of the queries coming from those
clients have DO flag set.
The DO bit is part of the EDNS option record, and some servers (and more to
the point, some firewalls) are broken and
In message 62426.10.0.66.17.1285784847.squir...@interact.purplecow.org, Denni
s Clarke writes:
I am trying to track down a bit of strange behavior. Not sure if anyone
else sees this.
I tend to run named in the foreground and in debug level 2 for a while
after I compile it. If all looks
Hi all,
We have been using dig to retrieve a domain's name servers for years.
Unfortunately, the dig syntax we normally use does not work when name
servers are misconfigured. Currently, dig is returning an empty name
server list for domain ilap.ca:
dig +short ilap.ca ns
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:51 -0400, Tristan Goguen wrote:
We would like to take some action when domain authority transfers take
place. Can we configure dig to return the name server list based
exclusively on a query to the root / TLD servers? Can local name
servers be ignored?
dig
We are also facing the same issue that AJ wrote previously.
We are trying to upgrade from bind version 9.4.3-P3 to 9.7.2-P2 using with
chroot environment on a Solaris 9.
It never see the following warning message when bind 9.4.3-P3 running on a
our solaris 9 server, but 9.7.1-P2, 9.7.2rc1 and
22 matches
Mail list logo
