Dear whoeveryouare,
can you please state in a clearer form (more understandable to non-native
english talkers) what your true opinion on the topic is?
And in case you did not understand what I was saying, here is clearer form of
my opinion:
A kernel module with another license (be it whatsoever)
Hi there,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Scott A. Wozny wrote:
Greetings BIND gurus,
Sorry, I can't make any claim to be a BIND guru.
... webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts of the US
and would like to use Bind 9.11.4
Hmmm. You might want to look e.g. at all the fixes since
"Splitting traffic evenly" may not be in the interest of your clients -
suppose their locations are skewed?
In any case, this seems like a lot of work - including committing to
ongoing maintenance - for not much gain.
Consider setting up an anycast address - let the network do the work.
This
Test
-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
[The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
U.S. Embassy Workers
Link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
On 23 Feb 2020, at 07:57, @lbutlr wrote:
> (9.11.6 should be coming really soon)
9.11.16, and I appear to be behind a touch, it is already released.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
Hello again,
at least you are beginning to sound a bit more like being able to discuss
something ;-)
The thing about a lawyer (I learned you are) is that they judge the world
according to lawsuits. You can learn from the history of my home country that
laws and courts are no measure for moral and
Redundant Links to Teo En Ming's Guide to Deploying CentOS Web Panel (CWP) Web
Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/23/71
[2] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2002.2/08712.html
[3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=158246414013004=2
[4]
On 22 Feb 2020, at 18:25, Scott A. Wozny wrote:
> I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts
> of the US and would like to use Bind 9.11.4
I’d consider changing that version. While Bind 9.11 *is* still supported, it is
EOL at the end of this year. If you
9.14.10 is the current stable release and 9.11.15 is the current extended
support release. Unless you know something is broken in 9.14.10 (unlikely)
that would be the version to $
You absolutely should not be running a bind version several years old, as
9.11.4 is.
But
Hello
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 1:28 PM Brett Delmage wrote:
> But 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1 is the version that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS supports,
> and
> will continue to for 2 more years.
Bionic has 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11 in the bionic-security pocket.
Please check
Thanks for your reply. I'm starting to really examine my motivations behind
traffic splitting by geography. While I definitely want to run traffic to all
web servers at all times (outside maintenance time and down time) the user
performance delta of geographical load balancing may not be
Hm, really it is quite hard to stay calm reading your constant insults on
people that have quite sure done a lot more for free software than you have.
I do understand why you cannot enter a discussion with your real name, as most
of your input is of zero quality - and below.
Unfortunately you did
> On Feb 23, 2020, at 6:57 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 2020, at 18:25, Scott A. Wozny wrote:
>> I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts
>> of the US and would like to use Bind 9.11.4
>
> I’d consider changing that version. While Bind 9.11 *is* still
> Please check /usr/share/doc/bind9/changelog.Debian.gz for the fixes
> and changes it has on top of upstream's 9.11.3.
You can also see it here:
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/b/bind9/bind9_9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11/changelog
Most recent security patch was on 2019-11-18.
This
ISC can not control what ubuntu provides, you are best taking this up
with ubuntu on their mailing lists.
On 24/02/2020 02:28, Brett Delmage wrote:
> But 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1 is the version that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS supports,
> and will continue to for 2 more years.
>
> Clearly, it is earlier
Thanks for the feedback. I'm trying to avoid building from source so I'm using
the version offered up by my distro which is presently 9.11.4-9.P2 on CentOS
7.6. I may end up having to change that position based upon external factors,
but if it works, it's supported and it's in my distro's
My apologies. I now realize how important that "extended support" P2 is after
the version number which I should have specified in my original email. I
assume that since OpenVAS credentialed scanning doesn't complain about it that
the really important patches have been backported to it which
Thanks for your reply. Regarding versioning, while I would like to be on the
most current version, I don't want to build from source and that leaves me
relying on my distro (CentOS 7.6 is where I put my stake in the ground, at
present) package manager's version which is presently 9.11.4-9.P2.
18 matches
Mail list logo
