Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

I tried now using libuv 1.35 and it failed again during make at CC src/unix/libuv_la-darwin-proctitle.lo In file included from /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Headers/AuthSession.h:32:0, from

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

Eddy, I fully agree with you. I wish I could do it. Unfortunately I failed to install libuv from scratch and I took a shortcut by using homebrew (and now I am paying for it, as I should). Paul > On Mar 25, 2021, at 11:05 PM, Eddy Hahn wrote: > > I do not use either of them because I cannot

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

I did use homebrew. It installed libuv 1.41.0 without any complaints. Is there something I could do to manually point BIND to libuv? Thank you, Paul > On Mar 25, 2021, at 10:12 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > libuv discovery requires pkg-config to be found. macports/homebrew installs > of

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

I do not use either of them because I cannot trust them. I build all dependencies from scratch so I do not have to depend on others- breaking things from one version to the next. Also I do not like to use the old libs shipped with the OS or install 3rd party into the OS directories. Cheers,

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

I’ve been building BIND on MacOS for years (currently on Catalina but has worked on almost the entire Mac OS X series. > > On Mar 25, 2021, at 7:50 PM, Paul Cizmas wrote: > > I am new to BIND and I am trying to install version 9.16.13 on a Mac OS X > 10.13.6. > > I downloaded version

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

libuv discovery requires pkg-config to be found. macports/homebrew installs of libuv should register libuv correctly. > On 26 Mar 2021, at 11:50, Paul Cizmas wrote: > > Hello: > > I am new to BIND and I am trying to install version 9.16.13 on a Mac OS X > 10.13.6. > > I downloaded version

BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

Hello: I am new to BIND and I am trying to install version 9.16.13 on a Mac OS X 10.13.6. I downloaded version 9.16.13 and, following the suggestions from https://krypted.com/mac-os-x/dns-install-bind-macos/ , I am trying to configure

Re: Timeout setting

This is a bug in postfix. Temporary failures in the DNS are not supposed to result in permanent failure at the SMTP level. SERVFAIL is not NXDOMAIN. -- Mark Andrews > On 26 Mar 2021, at 04:12, Julien Salort wrote: > > Hello, > > > I have a VPS running postfix and bind9. Bind is used as

Re: Timeout setting

Le 25/03/2021 à 18:21, John W. Blue via bind-users a écrit : When I queried the authoritative server directly it worked: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;111.250.179.17.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: 111.250.179.17.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN PTR rn2-msbadger07105.apple.com. ;; Query

RE: Timeout setting

When I queried the authoritative server directly it worked: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;111.250.179.17.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: 111.250.179.17.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN PTR rn2-msbadger07105.apple.com. ;; Query time: 62 msec ;; SERVER: 17.47.176.10#53(17.47.176.10) I would

Timeout setting

Hello, I have a VPS running postfix and bind9. Bind is used as a recursive resolver, in particular to be able to query anti-spam database. Postfix is also configured to reject incoming connections from servers with no reverse dns. It works great overall, but sometimes legitimate messages

Re: how to stop and remove BIND 9.9.7-P3 on Mac OS X High Sierra 10.13.6?

Paul Cizmas wrote: > > but it appears that “service” must be replaced by something else Yes: init on macOS is called launchd, and the service control program is called launchctl, which has a reasonably useful man page. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttps://dotat.at/ Mull of Galloway to Mull of

how to stop and remove BIND 9.9.7-P3 on Mac OS X High Sierra 10.13.6?

Hello: I am required by the school’s IT to replace BIND 9.9.7-P3 with 9.16.13. I identified that indeed the version running is 9.9.7-P3 by typing “named -v”. I am totally new to BIND and tried to follow the directions given at https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00312#

Advice on Bind9/ISC DHCP cluster

Hello, I would like to implement a 3 hosts cluster with the following features: 1- host1 is a bind9 master 2- host2 is a bind9 slave/ISC DHCP primary 3- host3 is a bind9 slave/ISC DHCP secondary 4- primary ISC DHCP instance sends dynamic updates to bind9 master 5- secondary ISC DHCP instance

Re: Temporarily no name resolution using second/virtual ip address

Jonathan via bind-users wrote: > It makes no difference from which subnet the queries come from. For > testing I used a server in the same subnet like my DNS is, so there is > no firewall or NAT in between. I also captured the network traffic of > the DNS-Server and -Client. All I can see is,