Hi,
I am trying 9.17 at home and I just noticed a very useful new lame-servers log
message:
2021-12-16T08:08:20.505Z lame-servers: timed out resolving
’stupiddomain.com/ANY/IN': X.Y.Z.T#53
I haven’t seen this on 9.16. Are there any plans to include it? It would
_really_ be useful. Our setup
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 10:02, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying 9.17 at home and I just noticed a very useful new lame-servers
> log message:
>
> 2021-12-16T08:08:20.505Z lame-servers: timed out resolving
> ’stupiddomain.com/ANY/IN': X.Y.Z.T#53
>
> I haven’t seen this on 9.16.
Dear all, I have one BIND9 server as master and 3 as slaves.
The master and one slave are in a given site #1, and the other two
slaves are in a geographical different site #2.
In case site #1 goes offline, I need to edit records in both slaves
from site #2, in order to point some services to
Am 16.12.21 um 14:04 schrieb Andrew P.:
So you're claiming that legitimate resolvers would still be pointing at the wrong IP address for a public DNS server after over 16 years?
besides that i don't know why you are answering off-list nowhere did i
say anything about 16 years
but it can
Sorry about forgetting to post the list. I hit Reply instead of Reply All.
Annoying inconsistent list servers
You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
domain name being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to
blacklist forged IP addresses
You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
domain name
being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to blacklist forged
IP addresses
of requestors (since we all know criminals don't use their own identities; they
use the
identities of innocent
Am 16.12.21 um 15:29 schrieb Andrew P.:
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 16.12.21 um 14:56 schrieb Andrew P.:
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
domain name
being asked for, so I don't answer
Am 16.12.21 um 14:49 schrieb Borja Marcos:
On 16 Dec 2021, at 13:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.12.21 um 10:02 schrieb Borja Marcos:
Hi,
I am trying 9.17 at home and I just noticed a very useful new lame-servers log
message:
2021-12-16T08:08:20.505Z lame-servers: timed out resolving
Am 16.12.21 um 10:02 schrieb Borja Marcos:
Hi,
I am trying 9.17 at home and I just noticed a very useful new lame-servers log
message:
2021-12-16T08:08:20.505Z lame-servers: timed out resolving
’stupiddomain.com/ANY/IN': X.Y.Z.T#53
I haven’t seen this on 9.16. Are there any plans to
Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
Sorry about forgetting to post the list. I hit Reply instead of Reply All.
Annoying inconsistent list servers
blame your mail-client for not support "reply-list" buttons and
"reply-all" is breaking this for me :-)
You don't understand what
FTR RRL will not help on this case. There’s no difference between response with
TC and response with REFUSED.
It would make a difference only if there was NOERROR response with data.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not
Am 16.12.21 um 14:35 schrieb Ondřej Surý:
FTR RRL will not help on this case. There’s no difference between response with
TC and response with REFUSED.
It would make a difference only if there was NOERROR response with data.
that's true but in case it's a reflection attack it would help
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 13:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.21 um 10:02 schrieb Borja Marcos:
>> Hi,
>> I am trying 9.17 at home and I just noticed a very useful new lame-servers
>> log message:
>> 2021-12-16T08:08:20.505Z lame-servers: timed out resolving
>>
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
>> You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
>> domain name
>> being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to blacklist
>> forged IP addresses
>> of requestors (since we all know
> On 16 Dec 2021, at 14:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.21 um 14:49 schrieb Borja Marcos:
>>>
>>> bind-9.16.23-1.fc34.x86_64
>>>
>>> 16-Dec-2021 13:08:10.598 lame-servers: connection refused resolving
>>> 'ns2.serverion.eu/A/IN': 94.228.210.122#53
>>> 16-Dec-2021 13:11:29.269
Am 16.12.21 um 14:56 schrieb Andrew P.:
Reindl Harald writes:
Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist the
domain name
being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to blacklist forged
IP addresses
of
Reindl Harald writes:
>Am 16.12.21 um 14:56 schrieb Andrew P.:
>> Reindl Harald writes:
>> Am 16.12.21 um 14:22 schrieb Andrew P.:
You don't understand what kind of blacklist I want; I want to blacklist
the domain name
being asked for, so I don't answer for it. I'm not looking to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37 AM Roberto Carna
wrote:
> Dear all, I have one BIND9 server as master and 3 as slaves.
>
> The master and one slave are in a given site #1, and the other two
> slaves are in a geographical different site #2.
>
> In case site #1 goes offline, I need to edit records
18 matches
Mail list logo
