Hello,
I have FreeBSD and the bind-tools 9.16.X package installed and I am using the
python module "isc" included in it with ansible.
Now when I tried to upgrade to bind-tools 9.18 package I see that the python
module is no longer included.
I thought it might be the FreeBSD package, but I
On 16. 08. 22 9:36, BÖSCH Christian wrote:
Hello,
I have FreeBSD and the bind-tools 9.16.X package installed and I am
using the python module "isc" included in it with ansible.
Now when I tried to upgrade to bind-tools 9.18 package I see that the
python module is no longer included.
I
On 16. 08. 22 10:41, Petr Špaček wrote:
On 16. 08. 22 9:36, BÖSCH Christian wrote:
Hello,
I have FreeBSD and the bind-tools 9.16.X package installed and I am
using the python module "isc" included in it with ansible.
Now when I tried to upgrade to bind-tools 9.18 package I see that the
>>
>> So my question is whether the isc python module no longer exists, and
>> whether there is an alternative?
>
> Please see release notes for 9.18.0, section Removed Features:
>
> https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9_18_5/notes.html#removed-features
>
>
On 16. 08. 22 12:46, BÖSCH Christian wrote:
>> So my question is whether the isc python module no longer exists, and
>> whether there is an alternative?
>
> Please see release notes for 9.18.0, section Removed Features:
>
I don’t mean to hijack the thread, but I think this is related. I also use the
BIND python modules. In particular, I'm using it to update my catalog zones as
described here: https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01401
This document has several references to BIND 9.18 without any mention of the
BIND
I don’t mean to hijack the thread, but I think this is related. I also use
the BIND python modules. In particular, I'm using it to update my catalog zones
as described here: https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01401
Yes, I'm using that too and wondering how to do that in 9.18 without the isc
So, I was trying to enforce a GET with DiG 9.18.1, but according to the
pcap it is still a POST.
I did this:
dig +http-plain-get @doh.example.nl TXT example.com
What am I doing wrong?
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening
--
Visit
On 8/17/22 02:27, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote:
Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server:
What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the
the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS
resolver doesn't add
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server:
> What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the
> the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS
> resolver doesn't add the additional section for the
On 16/08/2022 09:36, BÖSCH Christian wrote:
Hello,
I have FreeBSD and the bind-tools 9.16.X package installed and I am
using the python module "isc" included in it with ansible.
Now when I tried to upgrade to bind-tools 9.18 package I see that the
python module is no longer included.
I
BÖSCH Christian wrote:
> "White, Peter" wrote:
> >
> > I don’t mean to hijack the thread, but I think this is related. I also
> > use the BIND python modules. In particular, I'm using it to update my
> > catalog zones as described here: https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01401
>
> Yes, I'm using that
Hi list
Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server:
What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the
the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS
resolver doesn't add the additional section for the same query?
# Querying BIND
$ dig @test ns
13 matches
Mail list logo
