Hi dear
Pls help me for bind9
孙睿 / Rui Sun
-Original Message-
From: Sue Graves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 12:48 AM
To: Sun, Rui (IT Operation Director)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pls help me for bind9
As BIND is Open Source
Scott Haneda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before I go out on a limb, I wanted to ask those who know more about
this than I do. I added a zone change to my primary server, in this
case, setting the TTL's pretty low, as things were going to move
around a bit in the
At Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:18:27 -0800 (PST),
paulpsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly new to BIND, but have a pretty good understanding of DNS
and other protocols. I have been trying to make something work for
about a week now and can't figure it out. Is it possible to have a
cache only
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:53 +0100 (CET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rfc1918 ns records coming from internet are queried?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A border router knows what is inside and outside your network, while
a DNS server does not. Important
Due to technical difficulties, a number of messages were being held in
the moderation queue. These postings have now been cleared out (some
may be duplicates, for which I apologize).
We are still working out a couple of minor kinks in the move to the new
mailing list system.
Thanks for your
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disk i/o is just glacially slow when compared to network
i/o. To get disk logging up to network speeds you need to
throw away a lots of it.
Which suggests that having filtering built into the logging might
Hello,
Is there any way to make Bind check the server's availability before send back
responses to clients?
ie, given the domain name www.site.com was pointed to 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 in
Bind.
When a client query for www.site.com, Bind will check the health status for
these two servers. If one
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:53:43PM +0800,
Ken DBA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
ie, given the domain name www.site.com was pointed to 1.1.1.1 and
2.2.2.2 in Bind. When a client query for www.site.com, Bind will
check the health status for these two servers. If
Subject: FW: Pls help me for bind9
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:25:49 +0800
From: Sun, Rui \(IT Operation Director\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Hi dear
Pls help me for bind9
What problem are you having?
What does your named.conf look like? your zone files?
That ought to work, and work well.
This will not impact outside name servers that query your name server,
because they send iterative queries. If they're sending recursive
queries, they're abusing your server. I can't see any problems with this
approach.
If you have authoritative data in the
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 21:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I have two geographically different datacenters. Each
datacenter has two instances of BIND.
There is one master out of these four. The zones will have multiple
A records (pointing to the two datacenters to provide some
At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:17:17 -0800 (PST),
pollex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command:
STD_CDEFINES=-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096 ./configure --prefix=/usr/
local/bind9.3.6 --enable-threads
But
Shouldn't the server statement in options/view do the trick?
/Jonathan
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Todd Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try the listen-on directive.
Read more here:
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=zkZN52WhG8sCprintsec=frontcoverdq=
What we used to do is we had 2 masters. After an update was done on one of
them, we ran a perl script that would scp the db files to the other and then
send rndc reload to itself and the other master. That way both were always
up to date. It seems like if you had one master and one slave at each
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t, Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it writes:
why not? beter handled by isc and done in a clean way then 1.000.000 of
dirty ways as these ;)
Please go read RFC 5358. No where in there does it say to
drop responses. If we though that dropping queries was
better to use an ftps then an sftp.
use
vsftpd with SSL compile option
GNU lftp
lftp is really simple and can be configured to bypass RSA CA verify sso to
allow selfsigned and many other settings.
The difference is that if you lose RSA keys or in all cases, using the RSA
keys to allow SCP,
Not really. The server statement modifies how named talks to other
nameservers, it doesn't affect what addresses are listened on.
- Kevin
Jonathan Petersson wrote:
Shouldn't the server
Ken DBA wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to make Bind check the server's availability before send back
responses to clients?
ie, given the domain name www.site.com was pointed to 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 in
Bind.
When a client query for www.site.com, Bind will check the health status for
these two
On Dec 3, 6:26 pm, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is a forged packet it should be dropped regardless of the setting
of RD.
True, however not something that's easily determined from a distance.
Ideally ingress filtering would render this a non-issue, however
there obviously holes
19 matches
Mail list logo
