> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 12:05 AM
> To: jinmei_tat...@isc.org
> Cc: Vinny Abello; do...@freebsd.org; bind-us...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
>
> JINMEI Tatuya / ...@l@C#:H wrote:
> > A
JINMEI Tatuya / ...@l@C#:H wrote:
> At Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:26:25 -0500,
> Vinny Abello wrote:
>
>> Has anybody else tried this patch for you? I haven't had time to
>> look into this at all. If nobody has tried this yet, I'll get around
>> to it when I can and let you know the result.
>
> No one
Hello,
Running 9.5.1b2 on Solaris9.
Crashed with this info:
Dec 31 13:04:25 named[308]: [ID 873579 daemon.crit] rbtdb.c:1482:
REQUIRE((node)->references > 0) failed
Dec 31 13:04:25 named[308]: [ID 873579 daemon.crit] exiting (due to assertion
failure)
Dec 31 13:05:07 genunix: [ID 603404 kern.no
We had a similar problem when we moved some DNS servers to a DMZ that was
behind a firewall (a Cisco FWSM blade in a 6513 chassis.) A packet capture
showed that the initial query from the DNS server had the EDNS flag set. It
never got a response to that query, and would then resend it without the
In article ,
David Porsche' wrote:
>All,
>
>I have installed a caching only instance of BIND (9.2.4) on a CentOS
>machine on my internal network. I have noticed that initial DNS requests
>against the server take a rather large amount of time (usually around 7
>seconds). I have done some basic t
5 matches
Mail list logo
