Re: Bind-9.5 GSS-TSIG and dynamic updates.

At Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:11:20 -0500, Peter Fraser wrote: > > HI All > I have been working to get dynamic updates working with bind-9.5 and > FreeBSD 7 So far I have done the following: > > 1. COmpiled bind with GSSAPI enabled. > 2. Added these to named.conf > > options { >... > tke

Re: .\socket.c:633: INSIST(err == 0) failed

kenk...@yahoo.com wrote: > Anyone ever see this error with Bind running on Windows? > I only could find one reference to this in Google and it looks like he never > got an answer :-P > > [d:\bind\bin]named -g > 13-Feb-2009 22:16:57.082 starting BIND 9.6.0-P1 -g > 13-Feb-2009 22:16:57.102 built wi

.\socket.c:633: INSIST(err == 0) failed

Anyone ever see this error with Bind running on Windows? I only could find one reference to this in Google and it looks like he never got an answer :-P [d:\bind\bin]named -g 13-Feb-2009 22:16:57.082 starting BIND 9.6.0-P1 -g 13-Feb-2009 22:16:57.102 built with default 13-Feb-2009 22:16:57.102 fo

Re: Many udp ports open in bind 9.5.1

On 13 fév, 20:15, "Mike Bernhardt" wrote: > What you=92re seeing is ports your server has opened for queries. Then it > holds the port open while waiting for a reply and for some time after that. > For example, FROM ls1.tel.net.ba:29825=A0TO 203.64.139.9:domain. By design,= >  if > someone does a

Re: forwarding subdomain to internal box

Thanks all for the clear explanation. If I understand correctly: - forwarding is not a solution to my problem. (even the suggestion by Chris didn't help) - having ns1/ns2 slave from devbox would be a solution (but in my specific case I can't because devbox runs a custom nameserver based on

Re: Slave to master with multiple views

Jeffrey Collyer wrote: > This older article > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/networking/news/views_0501.html > > seems to indicate that the only way to get the slave to fully sync the > zones in both views is to create a virtual IP on the slave (with an IP > in the sandbox range) so the

Slave to master with multiple views

Setting up a slave NS to a master with multiple views. One view is public, the other is only handed out to a sandbox set of IPs (registration network). This older article http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/networking/news/views_0501.html seems to indicate that the only way to get the sla

Re: Possible problems with bind-9.5.1

At Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:10:02 +0100, "Elizabeta Zadro" wrote: > Before I had bind-9.5.0-P2 and now I upgrade to bind-9.5.1. I readed that in > bind-9.5.1 is additional support for query port randomization > > including performance improvement and port range specification. > > But is this ok? [

Re: forwarding subdomain to internal box

Just as there is a "default-less core" to Internet routing, there is also a "forwarding-less core" to Internet DNS, and your nameservers -- congratulations -- are in that core. The queries you get from other nameservers in the core are non-recursive, defined to mean "give me whatever informatio

Re: Dispatch errors

At Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:50:17 -0600, "Laws, Peter C." wrote: > Feb 13 09:01:22.663 dispatch: dispatch 0x3fdcc088: shutting down due to TCP > receive error: connection reset > > What do these really mean? Is that hex after the second instance of Most likely a remote authoritative server closed

RE: Many udp ports open in bind 9.5.1

What you’re seeing is ports your server has opened for queries. Then it holds the port open while waiting for a reply and for some time after that. For example, FROM ls1.tel.net.ba:29825 TO 203.64.139.9:domain. By design, if someone does a lot of queries to crackerjack.net, your server is going to

Re: forwarding subdomain to internal box

The zone forwarder you put in the conf of ns1/ns2 are only going to work for people actually using ns1/ns2 as their resolver. This is why when you get on a remote client and actually dig ns1 for the subdomain it works. However, when someone on the Internet as a whole asks for something.sub.company

Re: Inconsistent failure to resolve

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > At Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:36:18 -0500, > David Ford wrote: > > You specify the IP address of the NS in question as bogon. That > should be the reason for the SERVFAIL. > > >> acl "bogon" { >> > ... > >> 174.0.0.0/8; >> > ... > >> }; >> >>

forwarding subdomain to internal box

I'm trying to delegate a subdomain to a server that is not directly accessible from the internet, yet be able to resolve names in the subdomain from the internet. I understood 'forwarding' would be the solution but I can't get it to work completely: I have on both ns1 and ns2 which are authorit

Many udp ports open in bind 9.5.1

Before I had bind-9.5.0-P2 and now I upgrade to bind-9.5.1. I readed that in bind-9.5.1 is additional support for query port randomization including performance improvement and port range specification. But is this ok? netstat udp0 0 ls1.tel.net.ba:29825203.64.139.9:domain

Possible problems with bind-9.5.1

Hello, Before I had bind-9.5.0-P2 and now I upgrade to bind-9.5.1. I readed that in bind-9.5.1 is additional support for query port randomization including performance improvement and port range specification. But is this ok? netstat udp0 0 ls1.tel.net.ba:29825203.64

Dispatch errors

Feb 13 09:01:22.663 dispatch: dispatch 0x3fdcc088: shutting down due to TCP receive error: connection reset What do these really mean? Is that hex after the second instance of 'dispatch' meaningful to an admin or only to a BIND codemonkey? Not that there's anything wrong with codemonkies, I'm