On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:03:14 -0500, R Dicaire faxed us with
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
I have to admit that I am a bit baffled by this one. =A0I can query
against my bandwidth providers name servers (Comcast) and get name
resolution just fine for
Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
netblock in Russia:
05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
IN NS +
05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 security:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, enigmedia wrote:
Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
netblock in Russia:
05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
IN NS +
05-Mar-2009
One thing I should add is that chasing down lack of BCP38 compliance
isn't wack-a-mole though it may feel like it. This is a configuration
change and as such tends to be premanent especially once it get written
into the procedures documents.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas
In article gp065t$bm...@sf1.isc.org,
Stephen Ward stephen.usenet.w...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk wrote:
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by
There are other DNS servers that do a better job for RBLs.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Ward
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:20 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Zonefiles CIDR
Stephen Ward wrote:
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match
Kevin Darcy wrote:
But, as far as I can tell, there's no *practical* reason to disallow
underscores, other than the fact that it may trip the standards-checking
code of some _other_ piece of software. So, piece of software A
disallows underscores because it's worried about causing a problem
8 matches
Mail list logo