On Friday 13 March 2009 03:14 pm, Ben Bridges wrote:
> You can use one $GENERATE statement in each zone to generate all 256
> CNAME records for that zone.
I couldn't remember the name of that statement for the life of me.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services
P.O. Box 52200,
Hi,
A question about "$GENERATE", what I'm looking for though is if there's
an option or some way that if an entry is manually made, it will be used
in place of the "generated" entry, at present lookups will return both.
I'm trying to see where we can have-
$GENERATE 1-254 $.9 PTR cpe-9-$.qld.gu
I guess you can use "views" in bind
view "external" as master for outside users
view "internal" as slave of your windows dns for internal users
LD
On Friday 13 March 2009 07:35:13 Jeff Lightner wrote:
> e internal users would see. If the
> internal users need to see external records then it mu
Try a DHCP list perhaps?
- Kevin
Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:
As I understand it, leases cannot currently be created or destroyed
via OMAPI, nor can they be set to reserved.
Is their a time line of when this may come available?
The ability to control leases completely through Omapi withou
Inferior as MS-DNS may be, it is my experience that taking dns away from
AD admins is like trying to take a bone away from a pit bull. And it
sounds like the AD's already are forwarding requests to the BIND servers
(or performing recursive lookups, one of the two). So the only change I
was sugges
You can use one $GENERATE statement in each zone to generate all 256
CNAME records for that zone.
Ben
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:31 PM
> To: Mark Andr
At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:31:37 -0400,
R Dicaire wrote:
> > Please try 9.6.1b1, which we expect to be released next week. It has a
> > new experimental feature just for that purpose:
>
> Is this feature going to be back ported to 9.4 and 9.5 releases as well?
For 9.5, yes. For 9.4, not according
As I understand it, leases cannot currently be created or destroyed via
OMAPI, nor can they be set to reserved.
Is their a time line of when this may come available?
The ability to control leases completely through Omapi without having to
touch the dhcpd.conf file and reload for each one wou
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
wrote:
> Please try 9.6.1b1, which we expect to be released next week. It has a
> new experimental feature just for that purpose:
Is this feature going to be back ported to 9.4 and 9.5 releases as well?
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire pres
At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:53:09 -0300,
Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> I'm having SERVFAIL problems on some domains. I'm pretty sure it's
> not a bind problem, because everything is working but some few domains.
>
> I'm already running 9.6.0-P1 ...
>
> is it possible to, using dig or some
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:17 pm, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Just set up each of the /24's which make up the /20.
That's what I thought I had to do. I don't even have to assign the rDNS;
I only have to set the nameservers. Do I still need lines for each
individual IP# in each /24? Or is the
While testing TSIG zone xfers I came across the following:
The master server shows the zone was xferred out with TSIG, but the
slave server shows only that the zone was xferred in, no mention of
TSIG.
Is this normal?
My logging statements on both servers:
Server:
channel "myxferout" {
file "/etc
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:23 pm, Doug Barton wrote:
> It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and
> what is confusing you.
Haven't tried anything yet; still waiting for the assignment to us. I
was hoping to get a headstart on understanding the job.
> > I'm trying to
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 16:15
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Internal and External view on same slave server?
> We recently decided to create internal and external
We recently decided to create internal and external views for some
zones. This worked fine on the master server.
However, initiating zone transfer on slave from master it loaded all the
zone names I'd created but put exactly the same information into both
sets. This information was for the
Hello,
I'm having SERVFAIL problems on some domains. I'm pretty sure it's
not a bind problem, because everything is working but some few domains.
I'm already running 9.6.0-P1 ...
is it possible to, using dig or some other bind tool, to grab
informations from running BIND and deb
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:11 -0800, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and
> I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three
> years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more .
>
> I'm trying to set up a reverse delegati
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 16:51 -0500, Peter Laws wrote:
> Our environment includes a couple of AD servers. They serve DNS to PCs
> using AD (but not all PCs). They allow DDNS for clients and slave the rest
> of our environment's zones. For some reason, they *forward* every other
> query to us, b
Well not a perfect solution but what we have done for records that need
to be seen inside and outside is simply create the zone in both Windows
DNS and BIND.
In BIND we only have the stuff the outside world would see.
In Windows we have the stuff the internal users would see. If the
internal u
Ok, now please show us your dig command, and the output you are using
to test.
On Mar 12, 2009, at 8:19 PM, tzq tang wrote:
thanks for your response.I do this test between two intranet machine
and
each of them has a local IP.10.0.0.13,additionally the both domain
are in
the same DNS SERVE
20 matches
Mail list logo
