Hi all,
I'm thinking of writing a quick tool to archive the query-log in a
database to allow for easier reports.
The obvious question that occurs is; What would be what's the best
approach to do this?
Running scripts that parses through the query-log would cause locking
essentially killing BIND
What's worse than a mail-to-news gateway that leaving the multipart crap
headers in the body but removing the "Content-Type:
multipart/alternative" line from the header
In article , MontyRee
wrote:
> CkhlbGxvLCBhbGwuCiAKVGhhbmtzIGZvciBraW5kIGFuc3dlcmluZyBmb3IgRE5BTUUuCkkgaGF2
> ZSBhZGRpdG
Hello, all.
Thanks for kind answering for DNAME.
I have additional questions for DNAME.
If I set like below,
example.com. IN DNAMEexample2.com
IP addreess of example.com is 192.168.1.2
1. if client resolver use bind 8 or below old version.
What would be happen?
MontyRee wrote:
>
> Hello, all.
>
>
> I would like to CNAME like below.
>
> example.com. IN CNAMEexample2.com.
>
>
> But I know that this is wrong.
> then, is there any way or solution to solve this problem?
>
>
> I searched and found that below is a similar s
Hello, all.
I would like to CNAME like below.
example.com. IN CNAMEexample2.com.
But I know that this is wrong.
then, is there any way or solution to solve this problem?
I searched and found that below is a similar solution.
* IN CNAME
It seems that even in the most recent versions of BIND, rndc supports
only the hmac-md5 algorithm. Given that MD5 is being deprecated all over
the place (I am thinking of draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-md5-deprecated-02
in particular), is this wise?
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_
Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote, On 09/04/2009 10:26 AM:
On 9/4/2009 10:10 πμ, Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote:
On 7/4/2009 12:09 μμ, Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote:
On 6/4/2009 9:23 μμ, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:38:01 +0300,
Sotiris Tsimbonis wrote:
Anyone else seen crashes like these?
On Apr 27 2009, Mohammed Ejaz wrote:
Can it be possible through the bind, www records should work as failover, I
mean during the primary record unavailable and then it should go for next
www only, Pls. note that I don't want let they work as round robin function.
1. Primary www record pointing
The Best - use carp (VRRP) protocol for it or nginx proxy server.
Or you can use dynamic update for zone:
ping -c 5 your.host || nsupdate ...
Mohammed Ejaz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Can it be possible through the bind, www records should work as
> failover, I mean during the primary record un
In article ,
wrote:
> This is not the DNS job to check at the web service availability.
> You could make an external script that is testing for the service availibil=
> ity
> and change the dns accordingly, like (...) :
>
> web1 active ?
> yes : was it active at last test ?
> y
First of all many thanks for your response,
Actually we are in ISP; this solution is for one of our customer in this
case we need to give the access of the server to the customer,
Ejaz
_
From: philippe.simo...@swisscom.com [mailto:philippe.simo...@swisscom.com]
Sent: Monday,
This is not the DNS job to check at the web service availability.
You could make an external script that is testing for the service availibility
and change the dns accordingly, like (...) :
web1 active ?
yes : was it active at last test ?
yes : do nothing
no : set www
12 matches
Mail list logo
