Re: S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

2009-05-08 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:38:25AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote a message of 26 lines which said: > It is up to the application to sort and process the returned > records. But I suspect that this is precisely what the OP wanted (and expected BIND to do). Does anyone know a good free-

Re: host unreachable

2009-05-08 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Kurt Petersen wrote: > Hi > > I get a lot of log messages like this: > > named[6379]: client x.x.x.x#59767: error sending response: host unreachable > > I can ping x.x.x.x so I'm confused. > > Can some kind soul help? My guess is that the response was sent too late, and the cl

Re: S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

2009-05-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <90243c8a881f8d419d855264d9636f3a39f...@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>, " Gregory Waines" writes: > I understand the version 9 (and above) of BIND supports S-NAPTR. > > Is this supported in both the lightweight resolver and the full resolver > ? ... or ONLY the full resolver ? > > Greg W

Re: host unreachable

2009-05-08 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:22:59AM +0200, Kurt Petersen wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > named[6379]: client x.x.x.x#59767: error sending response: host unreachable > > I can ping x.x.x.x so I'm confused. On today's Internet, ping is a poor connectivity test because most machines a

Re: DNSSEC - where to start?

2009-05-08 Thread Evan Hunt
> So, for those of you who have done this, or looked around, played with > DNSSEC, etc, where do I start? Where is the "howto" guide for people > like me? I understand regular DNS just fine, but start adding SEPs, > DLVs, KSKs and I start getting lost. You might check out this slide presentation

DNSSEC - where to start?

2009-05-08 Thread Todd
I realize this question isn't strictly BIND related, but I am running BIND, and would like to use BIND to start looking at DNSSEC. I've spent the better part of today looking around for resources. I've found a few: http://www.dnssec-deployment.org/ https://www.ripe.net/projects/disi//dnssec_howto

Re: Quick poll: Cache poison vs site problems vs BIND bug vs Windows neg caching

2009-05-08 Thread Peter Dambier
Hi Wiley, I did have trouble with cached negatives. My isp is breaking my aDSL line at least once per day. When they had problems reconnecting I lost connectivity for a day when bind could not receive any answers for about 10 minutes. Reload with rndc did not help but restarting bind did. I expe

about named reload

2009-05-08 Thread Tech W.
Hi, When named is reloading (rndc reload) and at this time the query request is coming, what will be happened? Will this query be rejected? Thanks. Regards. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/li

S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

2009-05-08 Thread Gregory Waines
I understand the version 9 (and above) of BIND supports S-NAPTR. Is this supported in both the lightweight resolver and the full resolver ? ... or ONLY the full resolver ? Greg Waines Nortel Networks ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.

host unreachable

2009-05-08 Thread Kurt Petersen
Hi I get a lot of log messages like this: named[6379]: client x.x.x.x#59767: error sending response: host unreachable I can ping x.x.x.x so I'm confused. Can some kind soul help? Thanks Kurt ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org http

Quick poll: Cache poison vs site problems vs BIND bug vs Windows neg caching

2009-05-08 Thread Wiley Sanders
Howdy all, we're running 9.5.0-P2 (fairly recent) on two servers that are recursive DNS sources for a medium sized college. This week, we had more than a few users complaining about craigslist.org and www.chase.com not resolving, and sure enough when I checked with dig one of Craigslist's NS server

Re: Core dumping DLZ

2009-05-08 Thread Scott Haneda
On May 7, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: I beg to differ. Named only gets to this position in the code if it has been told to shut itself down. Note this may happen as a side effect of shutting the machine itself down. I can say with a lot of confidenc