On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:40:48PM -0500,
Martin McCormick mar...@dc.cis.okstate.edu wrote
a message of 36 lines which said:
I read that it is best for them all to be the same
version of bind.
Strange assertion.
this one needs to be like the rest rather than introducing new
unknowns in
In message 200906262140.n5qlemev047...@dc.cis.okstate.edu, Martin McCormick w
rites:
The present package for bind under ubuntu Linux is
bind9.5. This is great and I am not complaining at all but all
the rest of our bind servers are FreeBSD and using 9.3.5, soon
to be 9.3.6. I read that
I wrote:
The present package for bind under ubuntu Linux is
bind9.5. This is great and I am not complaining at all but all
the rest of our bind servers are FreeBSD and using 9.3.5, soon
to be 9.3.6.
Make that 9.5 now. I failed to catch that 9.3x had died at the
end of December.
Mark Andrews writes:
Have you really thought about this? The correct way to
backup the DNS is to use slaves. If all is going well you
will only loose a minute or two of changes. You really
don't want to roll back to what is in backup tapes.
At our
Hello John.
Cherney John-CJC030 wrote:
[rndc freeze zone]
Thanks! I hadn't tried that. I have a problem with that, though. I don't
know which of my ~600 zones will or won't have dynamic updates.
Well, if there is a .jnl file for a zone, it needs to be flushed. A bit
of shell scripting can
5 matches
Mail list logo
