Re: Problems with EDNS0

In message <4a64c374.4000...@serpro.gov.br>, Breno Silveira Soares writes: > Hi list, > > I have some servers with bind 9.5.0.P2 and one with bind 9.6.1. > And the servers logs have a lot of messages with "after disabling EDNS" > as seen above: > > [...] > Jul 20 15:31:34 server named[6909]: ed

Re: about cache nonexist record

--- On Tue, 21/7/09, Mark Andrews wrote: > From: Mark Andrews > Subject: Re: about cache nonexist record > To: "Tech W." > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Received: Tuesday, 21 July, 2009, 8:01 AM > > In message <950.42549...@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, > "Tech W." writes: > > > > Hello,

Re: about cache nonexist record

In message <950.42549...@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes: > > Hello, > > I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been using dyna > mic update. > > My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example test. > example.com, but this record do

Re: Issue with Two Views and Master/SLAVE Servers.

You've got some invalid syntax. Elements in a "masters" clause are separated by semicolons, not just whitespace. I don't believe you can use negation in a "masters" clause either. On the slave side, your main task is to ensure that your outgoing zone-transfer requests are signed with the appro

Re: A smarter stub resolver??

Todd Snyder wrote: The problem with this approach is when you are running a couple thousand servers - suddenly, you are running a couple thousand more instances of BIND that need monitoring/patching/care/feeding. A more clever resolver, or a simpler caching setup locally would be ideal. What

RE: A smarter stub resolver??

The problem with this approach is when you are running a couple thousand servers - suddenly, you are running a couple thousand more instances of BIND that need monitoring/patching/care/feeding. A more clever resolver, or a simpler caching setup locally would be ideal. Otherwise, you could redo

RE: Issue with Two Views and Master/SLAVE Servers.

Jeremy, Thanks for the replay, but I have ran into another issues. On the Slave server I am getting this error when I set up like the that of the FAQ, CHUCK PAYNE | Unix System Administrator TRAVEL CHANNEL MEDIA 3700 Mansell Rd, Suite 500 Alpharetta, GA 30022 Office: 404-269-5533 Blackberry:

Re: Bind 9.6.1: skipping zone transfer, but why ?

At Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:41:24 -0700, JINMEI Tatuya wrote: > We've found a bug that can cause this problem. We're working on a > complete fix to the problem, but a workaround patch copied below may > work for you in the mean time. Sorry that patch was incorrect. Copying the correct one. --- JIN

Re: Bind 9.6.1: skipping zone transfer, but why ?

At Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:13:03 +0100, "Ian Tait" wrote: > I see exactly this problem too on windows 2003. > Lookups happen normally after this behaviour occurs though. > > Restarting bind cures the problem. > I haven't bothered to debug the issue as yet :-) We've found a bug that can cause this p

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

Lev Vanyan wrote: 20.07.09 14:11, Chris Thompson написав(ла): On Jul 20 2009, Dmitry Rybin wrote: Lev Vanyan wrote: i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag changed depending on the IP address o

Problems with EDNS0

Hi list, I have some servers with bind 9.5.0.P2 and one with bind 9.6.1. And the servers logs have a lot of messages with "after disabling EDNS" as seen above: [...] Jul 20 15:31:34 server named[6909]: edns-disabled: info: success resolving 'www.click21.com.br/A' (in 'www.click21.com.br'?) af

Re: BIND 9.6 freezing on update to signed zone (rare!)

On Jul 15 2009, I wrote: We had an incident last night on the authoritative nameserver which is master for dnssec-test.csi.cam.ac.uk (a signed zone). At the time it was running BIND 9.6.1rc1 (but I doubt if 9.6.1 is going to make a difference). A script-generated update timed out, and it subsequ

Re: A simple question, please help

Ken Lai wrote: Scott Haneda wrote: 99% of the time openDNS works by just pointing some agent to their ip space. That 1% of the time, openDNS tries to make DNS responses that are modified in a way to try to help you. Maybe this is your issue? Googl.com being common enough they elect to retu

Re: A smarter stub resolver??

Rather than applying lipstick to the pig, why not run a local caching-only resolver? Move up and out of the stub-ville slums. A local instance of named doesn't take up that much server resources (disk, memory, CPU), and pays you back by *not*, as a stub resolver does, using network resources, a

RE: Bind 9.6.1: skipping zone transfer, but why ?

Hi, I see exactly this problem too on windows 2003. Lookups happen normally after this behaviour occurs though. Restarting bind cures the problem. I haven't bothered to debug the issue as yet :-) Ian -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun..

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

20.07.09 14:11, Chris Thompson написав(ла): > On Jul 20 2009, Dmitry Rybin wrote: > >> Lev Vanyan wrote: >>> >>> i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND >>> in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag >>> changed depending on the IP address o

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

On Jul 20 2009, Dmitry Rybin wrote: Lev Vanyan wrote: i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party. For example, there are two SRV records

Re: about cache nonexist record

On Jul 20 2009, Tech W. wrote: I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been using dynamic update. My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example test.example.com, but this record doesn't exist. How long time will the remote DNS cache this nonexist

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

Lev Vanyan wrote: i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party. For example, there are two SRV records for _foobar._tcp. One points to 10.0.1

SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

Hello everyone, i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party. For example, there are two SRV records for _foobar._tcp. One points to 10.0.1.2 a

about cache nonexist record

Hello, I have Bind-9.6.1 running on our university environment, have been using dynamic update. My question is, when other DNS query my named for a record, for example test.example.com, but this record doesn't exist. How long time will the remote DNS cache this nonexist record? I found the p