Hi,
I have multiple ip adresses for one server:
www.mydomain.comhttp://www.mydomain.com A
10.0.0.1
www.mydomain.comhttp://www.mydomain.com A
10.0.0.2
www.mydomain.comhttp://www.mydomain.com A
10.0.0.3
I
Denis Laventure wrote:
Hi,
I have multiple ip adresses for one server:
www.mydomain.com http://www.mydomain.com
A 10.0.0.1
www.mydomain.com http://www.mydomain.com
A 10.0.0.2
www.mydomain.com
Hi,
I run into an unclear situation while trying to resolve certain domains.
It happened when I tried with 9.7.0rc1, 9.7.0b and also with 9.7.0. I
dont's have a whole lot of other BIND versions at my disposal, but I
found an older one, 9.3.4-P1.2, and that one works fine.
One of the domains that
Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:
Anyone any clue? I am trying to understand why some resolvers handle
this query well, while BIND 9.7.x returns a SERVFAIL.
acl...@yellow:~$ dig +short airfrance.fr ns
webaf1.airfrance.fr.
lasvegas.airfrance.fr.
proof.rain.fr.
acl...@yellow:~$ dig +short
Hi Doug,
I just installed from a local compiled bind-9.7.0.tar.gz with all ISC defalt
settings and the issue is gone.
Thank you,
Julian
- Original Message -
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
To: ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net
Cc: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org;
I just installed ISC 9.7.0 on one of our x86 SUN Solaris 10 machines.
I did a fresh local compiled install with all default settings.
It looks that DNS is working fine for customers (anyway the time is too
short to conclude that), but my syslog suddenly got populated with tones of
daemon.notice
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, ic.nssip wrote:
I just installed ISC 9.7.0 on one of our x86 SUN Solaris 10 machines.
I did a fresh local compiled install with all default settings.
It looks that DNS is working fine for customers (anyway the time is too short
to conclude that), but my syslog suddenly
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Some loggings maybe could be made more clear, for example:
stats.surfaid.ihost.com/
no SOA returned
Not sure why I saw that. Looking again I see com. But I have other
problems there too.
___
If you wish to sign using NSEC3 instead of NSEC, you should add an
NSEC3PARAM record to the initial update request. If you wish the NSEC3
chain to have the OPTOUT bit set, set it in the flags field of the
NSEC3PARAM record.
% nsupdate
ttl 3600
--- cut dnskey
From /etc/bind/named.conf
forwarders {
212.27.53.252;
212.27.54.252;
};
listen-on {
192.168.0.1;
127.0.0.1;
};
What do these lines do?
http://www.unfreeze.net/?p=84
Thank you.
___
bind-users mailing list
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:30:27 -0800 (PST)
From: gmspro gms...@yahoo.com
Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
From /etc/bind/named.conf
forwarders {
212.27.53.252;
212.27.54.252;
};
Queries will be forwarded to these to name servers rather than be
I have a couple of BIND servers that I have inherited. I'm getting some
upstream complaints that one of them is issuing duplicate queries on
occasions - probably about a dozen times a day. When it happens, sure
enough I find this in the logs:
named[6905]: 18-Feb-2010 22:31:41.201 client
12 matches
Mail list logo
