Thanks. Now got the hint.
-dani
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> itservices88 writes:
> > --===7275078350313162311==
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> >
> > --000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> > Con
In message ,
itservices88 writes:
> --===7275078350313162311==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
>
> --000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone suggest why i am having Glue Record
On 06/01/10 23:02, itservices88 wrote:
Hi,
Can someone suggest why i am having Glue Record Error ? And how i can
resolve it.
Well the tool tells you the problem, click the link and you'll see:
The address of a name server differed from the child and the parent.
This is a configuration error a
Hi,
Can someone suggest why i am having Glue Record Error ? And how i can
resolve it.
http://dnscheck.iis.se/?time=1275458333&id=764597&view=basic&lang=&test=standard
Thanks
-dani
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.o
hello all
hello bind network
I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails
I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec
all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org
the reason for my problem just the reason that I have updated my pos
In message <573607.58516...@web114302.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, Heavy Man writes:
> A few questions about DNSSEC...
>
> I understand the root zones are currently getting signed. Just for sanit=
> y sake, should I be able to DIG +dnssec a.gtld-servers.net and be able to s=
> ee a RRSIG record (assume
One obvious solution to keeping the firewall guys happy would just be
to make them not burn state entries for the nameserver at all
Firewalls in front of nameservers cause an ungodly amount of issues
for no real benefit...
Just sayin'...
W
On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Techi wrote:
>From the release notes:
--- 9.6.2-P2 released ---
2876. [bug] Named could return SERVFAIL for negative responses
from unsigned zones. [RT #21131]
Question:
Does this bug only occur if dnssec is enabled?
or only if dnssec validation is turned on?
or will it (p
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Heavy Man wrote:
> A few questions about DNSSEC...
>
> I understand the root zones are currently getting signed.
The root zone is currently signed with a DURZ (deliberately unvalidatable
root zone) as part of its deployment. See the following site for more
infor
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 06:55:14AM -0700,
Heavy Man wrote
a message of 61 lines which said:
> I understand the root zones are currently getting signed
There is only one root zone...
> Just for sanity sake, should I be able to DIG +dnssec
> a.gtld-servers.net and be able to see a RRSIG record
A few questions about DNSSEC...
I understand the root zones are currently getting signed. Just for sanity
sake, should I be able to DIG +dnssec a.gtld-servers.net and be able to see a
RRSIG record (assume I have a valid dnssec recursive name server with a valid
trust anchor configured). Check
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:52:56PM +0300, Techi wrote:
> On Tue 01 of Jun 2010 15:43:54 you wrote:
> > What version of BIND are you running? If you're getting FD limits, I'd
> > think it's an older version with a bug, and your problems might also be
> > alleviated by upgrading.
> Version: bind-9
On Tue 01 of Jun 2010 15:43:54 you wrote:
> What version of BIND are you running? If you're getting FD limits, I'd
> think it's an older version with a bug, and your problems might also be
> alleviated by upgrading.
Version: bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
I cannot upgrade. Company's policy is to use o
What version of BIND are you running? If you're getting FD limits, I'd think
it's an older version with a bug, and your problems might also be alleviated by
upgrading.
Todd.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=ri
Hallo,
Recently, I faced huge problems with my DNS servers (bind crashed with no
apparent reason). Some of the symptons were:
* Huge number of connections on our firewalls (>15).
* A lot of errors in syslog about max file descriptors limits reached
(currently on system, the FD limit is 4096,
On 31.05.10 14:16, rams wrote:
> I have the following zone file:
>
> $ORIGIN td3497.com.
>
> @ IN SOA udns1.ultradns.net. ppk.yahoo.com. (
> 2010052610 ; serial
> 10800 ; refresh
> 3600 ; retry
> 2592000 ; expire
> 86400 ; minimum
> )
>
> cname.chain.td3497.com. 86400 IN CNAME mx.chain.td3497.co
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01.06.10 14:16, rams wrote:
I queried for cname domain against bind 9.6.X and got the following response
C:\Documents and Settings\rameshb>dig @localhost cname.td3497.com mx
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P1 <<>> @localhost cname.td3497.com mx
; (1 server
On 01.06.10 14:16, rams wrote:
> I queried for cname domain against bind 9.6.X and got the following response
> C:\Documents and Settings\rameshb>dig @localhost cname.td3497.com mx
> ; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P1 <<>> @localhost cname.td3497.com mx
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answ
Hi ,
I have the following zone file:
$ORIGIN td3497.com.
@ IN SOA udns1.ultradns.net. ppk.yahoo.com. (
2010052610 ; serial
10800 ; refresh
3600 ; retry
2592000 ; expire
86400 ; minimum
)
cname.chain.td3497.com. 86400 IN CNAME mx.chain.td3497.com.
mx.chain.td3497.com. 86400 IN MX 34 mx1.chain.td349
Is there any update on the following issue.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:16 PM, rams wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have the following zone file:
>
> $ORIGIN td3497.com.
>
> @ IN SOA udns1.ultradns.net. ppk.yahoo.com. (
>
> 2010052610 ; serial
>
> 10800 ; refresh
>
> 3600 ; retry
>
> 2592000 ; expire
>
> 8640
20 matches
Mail list logo
