On 28.06.10 13:31, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
We have received reports that BIND 9.7.0 and 9.7.1 are failing to
resolve certain zones. These zones are resolved correctly by earlier
versions of BIND.
BIND 9.7.0 and 9.7.1 follows the DNS protocol more strictly than
earlier versions. We felt that
Hi everyone
Very new to bind (or dns for that matter).
I am wanting to know if there is a way to setup a slave only server for my
network.
I would like it to simply act as a secondary server should the main server
fail.
I would also like the slave server to automatically add any (all) new
Hi,
We have clients that have started to report that they are not able to
resolve certain hosts from our recursing/caching resolvers (BIND
9.3.6-4/EL5). I am wondering if this has something to do with EDNS or
the DNSSEC rollout to root servers on May 5th.. or perhaps with our
Cisco ASA's at the
Ok, so I answered my own question. It was indeed our ASA's at the
border.
Thanks,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Baird, Josh
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:55 PM
On 6/29/2010 5:36 PM, Fred Zinsli wrote:
Hi everyone
Very new to bind (or dns for that matter).
I am wanting to know if there is a way to setup a slave only server for my
network.
I would like it to simply act as a secondary server should the main server
fail.
Would these main and
Cent OS 5.4(32bit) +mysql 5.1.48
# /usr/local/bind/sbin/named -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf -u named -g -d 1
30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 starting BIND 9.7.1 -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf
-u named -g -d 1
30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 built with '--prefix=/usr/local/bind'
In message 201006301020006377...@114.com.cn, ShanyiWan writes:
Cent OS 5.4(32bit) +mysql 5.1.48
# /usr/local/bind/sbin/named -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf -u named -g -d
1
30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 starting BIND 9.7.1 -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.con
f -u named -g -d 1
30-Jun-2010
7 matches
Mail list logo