On 7/24/2010 5:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>
>> On 7/22/2010 11:08 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
>>> Thanks for the confirmation that the problem was related to DNSSEC.
>>>
>>> I didn't see your message until I got home from work; however,
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
On 7/22/2010 11:08 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation that the problem was related to DNSSEC.
I didn't see your message until I got home from work; however, I did
find the
After upgrading to bind 9.7.1 recently, some of my scripts started to
output text when they shouldn't. Digging a little, I quickly found
that dnssec-signzone now unconditionally writes information like this
on stderr:
Verifying the zone using the following algorithms: RSASHA1.
Zone signin
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:32:21PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 24/07/2010 16:17:13, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> > Quick, knee-jerk, which of these is
> > one day?
> > 86300
> > 68300
> > 863000
>
> It's a trick question, right?
Very good! ;-)
--
/
On 24/07/2010 16:17:13, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> Quick, knee-jerk, which of these is
> one day?
> 86300
> 68300
> 863000
It's a trick question, right?
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:07:54AM +0100, Sam Wilson wrote:
...
> I *would* recommend using @ everywhere possible - it's so much less
> liable to typos than using the real domain and unnecessary obfuscation
> is not your friend when it comes to DNS administration. :) :)
...
Seconded.
I would a
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
> >
> > Why would any inspection policy not allow fragmented UDP packets?
> > There's nothing wrong with that.
>
> Because it's "hard" The issue is that then you need to buffer
> fragments until you get
In article ,
Peter Laws wrote:
> On 07/22/10 19:57, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > In article,
> > Peter Laws wrote:
> >
> >> I have multiple interfaces on my master and multiple interfaces on most of
> >> my slaves.
> >>
>
>
> >>
> >> Is that expected behavior?
> >
> > Yes. What if the first s
On 07/24/2010 03:57 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
Applications that depend on specific behaviors are broken. You should
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree here.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailma
On Jul 23, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Danny Mayer wrote:
> On 7/22/2010 11:08 PM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
>> Thanks for the confirmation that the problem was related to DNSSEC.
>>
>> I didn't see your message until I got home from work; however, I did
>> find the root of the problem late this aft
10 matches
Mail list logo