Re: Bind 9.7.2+ Extending views with groups

In article , J. Thomsen wrote: > The view facility is apparently only useful for several copies of the same > zone and not for > grouping zones. > > If a zone is not present in the first view matching the client, but in > another view below, > BIND will apparently return a response of zone no

Re: Reverse Configuration

> From: Barry Margolin > Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:24:37 -0400 > Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org > > In article , > João Alberto Kuchnier wrote: > > > Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP > > distribution. > > > > My rev file, have PTR entrie

Bind 9.7.2+ Extending views with groups

The view facility is apparently only useful for several copies of the same zone and not for grouping zones. If a zone is not present in the first view matching the client, but in another view below, BIND will apparently return a response of zone not found and not use the next matching view. As

Bind 9.7.2-P2: skipping zone transfer

The handling of large numbers of zone transfers between master and slave is not working well. Having several thousands of zones and a new slave DNS on the same internal network made me change the low defaults to this: master: transfers-out 20; transfers-per-ns 20; slave: transfers-in 20; transf

Re: Reverse Configuration

In article , João Alberto Kuchnier wrote: > Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP > distribution. > > My rev file, have PTR entries for all of them. Its not necessary? Yes, that's what I said: > > While you can legally have multiple reverse entries for the IP, it's n

Re: Reverse Configuration

Thanks Niobos! I already talked with my ISP. I informed them my new records. In the begining of the next week I think this will finally be solved. João K. Em Sex, 2010-10-15 às 20:02 +0200, Niobos escreveu: > On 2010-10-15 17:14, João Alberto Kuchnier wrote: > > Dispite of that, I'm having some p

Re: Reverse Configuration

Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP distribution. My rev file, have PTR entries for all of them. Its not necessary? João K. Em Sex, 2010-10-15 às 22:44 -0400, Barry Margolin escreveu: > In article , > João Alberto Kuchnier wrote: > > > Ari, > > > > I fixed it to u

control channel protocol?

Hi, for one project we are using the "traditional" file based approach, where we update the zone files and call rndc to notify Bind about the changes. At some point I asked myself whether we could avoid calling rndc over and over and instead directly communicating with Bind, even if the protoc