need to disable dnssec for pseudo TLD zone

2010-10-28 Thread Antonio Querubin
When I recently installed the root dnssec initial key on our DNS it broke it's ability to accept responses for forwarded requests for a DNS block list zone served by another system. Other queries aren't affected. The config for the forwarded zone looks like: zone dnsbl { type

Re: non-improving referral

2010-10-28 Thread Leo Baltus
Hi Mark, Op 28/10/2010 om 13:38:13 +1100, schreef Mark Andrews: In message 20101026161348.gj2...@omroep.nl, Leo Baltus writes: We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2. We have our authoritative servers migrated to bind-9.7.2-P2 and it all seems to work

basic MX question

2010-10-28 Thread fddi
Hello I have a question. I am going to start in production environment a bunch of 3 mail servers for my domain, let'say mydomain.com I need to install a X509 certificate on each server in a way that upon x509 authentication thunderbird or whatever MUA won't complain about hostname different

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Phil Mayers
On 28/10/10 11:56, Tony Finch wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: My question is why would INMX10mcvpemr01 and INMX 10mcvpemr02 be repeated trough the zone file surely this is redundant ? Some hostmasters like to ensure that mail is not directed to hosts

Re: basic MX question

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, fddi wrote: I am going to start in production environment a bunch of 3 mail servers for my domain, let'say mydomain.com I need to install a X509 certificate on each server in a way that upon x509 authentication thunderbird or whatever MUA won't complain about hostname

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.585.1288263412.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: My question is why would INMX10mcvpemr01 and INMX 10mcvpemr02 be repeated trough the zone file surely this is redundant ?

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Andrews
In message barmar-ed15c5.21262028102...@news.eternal-september.org, Barry Mar golin writes: In article mailman.585.1288263412.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: My question is why would INMX10mcvpemr01

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Fr34k
- Original Message From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org To: Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 9:49:46 PM Subject: Re: out of place mx records. In message barmar-ed15c5.21262028102...@news.eternal-september.org,