I'm attempting to get Bind 9.7.2 (built on openSUSE 11.3) running in
relation to Samba4; this uses GSSAPI authentication to update the Bind
zones. Everything works except this part. I've build bind with
--with-gssapi, verified krb5 is linked in, and verified [at least with
kinit and other
Casey Deccio casey at deccio.net writes:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Brian J. Murrell brian at interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
$ dig @linux -p 1053 41.70.55.206.sa-trusted.bondedsender.org txt
Doh! I forgot the +dnssec.
What happens when you run the following queries:
dig +dnssec @linux -p
We are working with a software vendor whose software only works with relative
hostnames - they say it can't cope with a fully-qualified domain name. They
want us to make sure the necessary domain is in all clients' search lists. Does
anyone have any good references for me to explanations of why
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear User Community -
BIND 10 is now in its second year of development, and we would like to
hear more from current BIND 9 users about operational needs for BIND 10
as we move toward the more user-facing aspects of BIND 10 development.
This survey
Hi all,
we are in a situation here in our company that is: we need to send a
internal IP address in a answer of a query when the source is a specific IP.
So we created a new view and put the source address of this IP and
configured the internal zone file on this view and this is working well.
Is there a way or option to configure bind to do the following logic: If the
bind didn’t find a entry in a view 1 (internal view) it will search this
entry on the view 2 (external view) ?
Not to my knowledge. We had the same problem and ended up with using the hosts
file for
the special IP
From: St?phanas Schaden stephan...@ctbc.com.br wrote:
Is there a way or option to configure bind to do the following logic:
If the bind didn't find a entry in a view 1 (internal view) it will
search this entry on the view 2 (external view) ?
Place the common piece in a separate include file:
Hi Barry,
I'm sorry but I didn't understand the configuration. Could you give
me an example of the named.conf.non-views ?
Thank you.
Stéphanas Schaden
stephan...@ctbc.com.br
Uberlândia - MG - Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: bind-users-bounces+stephanass=ctbc.com...@lists.isc.org
On 11/10/2010 3:17 PM, J. Thomsen wrote:
Is there a way or option to configure bind to do the following logic: If the
bind didn’t find a entry in a view 1 (internal view) it will search this
entry on the view 2 (external view) ?
Not to my knowledge. We had the same problem and ended up with
What you're suggesting is not really the inverse of forward first.
Forward first is basically: (try forwarding) - [TIMEOUT FROM ALL
FORWARDERS] - (try iterative resolution)
The inverse would be: (try iterative resolution) - [TIMEOUT FROM ALL
AUTHORITATIVE NAMESERVERS] - (try forwarding)
But
Not sure why you felt it necessary to resort to hosts files.
Well, I don't know how to configure ressource records in an include file and
don't want to
waste gigabytes of RAM duplicating zones.
What am I missing here?
The idea of avoiding front ends !
Views in BIND was never meant to
On 11/10/2010 1:19 PM, Maria Iano wrote:
We are working with a software vendor whose software only works with relative
hostnames - they say it can't cope with a fully-qualified domain name. They
want us to make sure the necessary domain is in all clients' search lists. Does
anyone have any
Alans,
I think you're mixing up the resolver function with the
hosting function. With some development and implementation, you can
offer your customers the ability to set up and maintain their own
domains on one nameserver instance, and then have another instance set
up for them
In article mailman.695.1289418925.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Stéphanas Schaden stephan...@ctbc.com.br wrote:
Hi all,
we are in a situation here in our company that is: we need to send a
internal IP address in a answer of a query when the source is a specific IP.
So we created a new
On 11/10/2010 7:23 PM, J. Thomsen wrote:
Not sure why you felt it necessary to resort to hosts files.
Well, I don't know how to configure ressource records in an include file and
don't want to
waste gigabytes of RAM duplicating zones.
If your main concern is resource consumption, maybe you
Hi
This is not a bind problem, not really a DNS problem. I still hope that
these might be able to help provide the solution.
With the growing number of registrars of e.g. .com domains, it becomes
difficult or even almost impossible to figure out which whois server you
should ask for information
Hi Sten,
With the growing number of registrars of e.g. .com domains, it becomes
difficult or even almost impossible to figure out which whois server you
should ask for information about a domain name.
Use Whois (first under the 'Other software:' heading) from
the command prompt.
17 matches
Mail list logo
