I have update my dns1 to DNSSEC and now I have two probems...
1) dns2 does not more update
2) nsupdate from my admin website does not more work and give me an
ExitStatus 2. Unfortunately the manpage does not tell me what 2 is.
But I assume it hast the same problem like dns2
Can
Hi everyone!
First and foremost, Happy New Year!
Secondly, this is my first post in this list and my first
question is part technical, part administrative. Basically,
I have hosted a webserver with a hosting company,
who also manages my domain. Now, I have decided to
setup a local mail server
Note: My nsupdate script us an autogenerated file like:
if ($_GET['nsupdate'] == 'on') {
$tmp_file = tempnam('/tmp', 'tdphp-vserver.');
chmod($tmp_file, 0700);
$fh = fopen($tmp_file, 'a');
fwrite($fh, server dns1.tamay-dogan.net\n);
On 01/05/2011 03:32 AM, Paul Ooi Cong Jen wrote:
Hi,
Nope. Dynamic zone require keys exchange for zone transfer.
This is not correct.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
My method for solving this problem is to have a local DNS with two views:
- internal view (recursing), responding to internal clients with local
addresses
- external view (not recursing), that is used as a hidden master for my
DNS-provider
No forwarding, the local server does all its own
On 01/05/2011 03:01 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Hello,
When adding a statement of something like:
allow-update { 127.0.0.1; };
to the zone configuration, this zone will become a dynamic zone, is it?
Yes.
You can also do:
allow-update { key NAME; };
...and in newer versions of bind
On 01/05/2011 08:09 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have update mydns1 to DNSSEC and now I have two probems...
Do you mean you have signed your zone?
If so, you are aware that bind requires the zone-signing key to be
available in order to perform updates - like this:
zone $name {
type
Maybe just a detail without much significance. Will the zone become
dynamic when you enable updates OR when you have actually done the first
update - i.e. created the .jnl file?
On 05/01/11 10:15, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 01/05/2011 03:01 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Hello,
When adding a
On 01/05/2011 11:45 AM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
Maybe just a detail without much significance. Will the zone become
dynamic when you enable updates OR when you have actually done the first
update - i.e. created the .jnl file?
A dynamic zone is a zone that allows dynamic updates, so the former.
Hello Phil Mayers,
Am 2011-01-05 09:19:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Do you mean you have signed your zone?
Yes
If so, you are aware that bind requires the zone-signing key to be
available in order to perform updates - like this:
zone $name {
type master;
allow-update { ... };
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 20:50, Steve Zeng wrote:
I don't have NS record for both of the slaves (windows DNS slave and Linux
DNS slave). I use also-notify and it works for Windows DNS slave. But not
for BIND/Linux.
Is SELinux running on this system? I seen you are running CentOS and in
Rndc transfer (initialized at the slave side) works fine...
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ooi Cong Jen [mailto:paul...@takizo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:01 PM
To: Steve Zeng
Cc: Robert Spangler; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind slave not get DNS update
I'm having a query problem and hope I'm at the right mailing list...
I get a recursion not available message intermittently when using
nslookup. The message will appear on the first query, presumably to
un-cached IP/hostname and subsequent queries to the same IP/hostname
will succeed without
On 05/01/11 21:36, vr wrote:
I'm having a query problem and hope I'm at the right mailing list...
Formally, probably not, since what you describe isn't a BIND
issue. That said, the people on this list are likely among
those who can best give you helpful advice.
I get a
On 05/01/11 01:50, Steve Zeng wrote:
I don't have NS record for both of the slaves (windows DNS slave and
Linux DNS slave). I use also-notify and it works for Windows DNS
slave. But not for BIND/Linux.
On 05/01/11 19:56, Steve Zeng wrote:
Rndc transfer (initialized at the slave side) works
Tcpdump on master(A.A.A.A) shows the following:
23:59:54.788272 IP A.A.A.A.domain C.C.C.C.domain: 26512 notify [b23=0x2400]
[1a] SOA? mydomain.com. (72)
23:59:54.788898 IP C.C.C.C.domain A.A.A.A.domain: 26512 notify Refused-
0/0/0 (26)
So it looks like master did sent notify out but
In message 8b5c6f575422414aa91b46c454126b6c02666af...@exchmvs.exchange.airg,
Steve Zeng writes:
Tcpdump on master(A.A.A.A) shows the following:
And what source address does the slave see?
23:59:54.788272 IP A.A.A.A.domain C.C.C.C.domain: 26512 notify [b23=0x240
0] [1a] SOA?
On slave, it sees the public IPs. tcpdump shows:
01:38:51.035945 IP A.A.A.A.domain C.C.C.C.domain: 7545 notify [b23=0x2400]
[1a] SOA? airg.com. (72)
01:38:51.036174 IP C.C.C.C.domain A.A.A.A.domain: 7545 notify Refused- 0/0/0
(26)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews
Ich bin abwesend und kehre am 12.01.2011 zurück.
Danke für Ihre E-Mail-Nachricht.
Ich bin bis 11. Januar 2011 nicht im Büro.
In dringenden Angelegenheiten kontaktieren Sie bitte DENIC IT-Services
(E-Mail: i...@denic.de, Tel: (069) 27235-160 oder -250).
-
Thank you for your email message.
I
19 matches
Mail list logo