On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Dan wrote:
>
> I think there are really 2 sides to this, whether your after an OS easy to
> maintain, with great stability, or best performance. I think you'll fall in
> love with freebsd if you give it a try,
Try explaining that to managerial types who thinks "we
I think there are really 2 sides to this, whether your after an OS easy to
maintain, with great stability, or best performance. I think you'll fall
in love with freebsd if you give it a try, on otherhand if your after as
many queries per second for a machine as possible, I have had better
exp
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 19:11 -0600, Dan wrote:
>
> I'll second that, I think everyone starts off on linux as new admins,
> then eventually figures out how great freebsd ports collection is.
> Also have openbsd's PF firewall at our disposal, along with rebuilding
> complete OS in one command, unli
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:52 AM, pollex wrote:
> Hi, I want to know in your experience what is the best operating
> system to run bind for an ISP. We currently have Debian for the 5
> Cache servers and for the 2 Authoritative servers.
> We have around 111851 success querys in the cache servers and
I'll second that, I think everyone starts off on linux as new admins,
then eventually figures out how great freebsd ports collection is.
Also have openbsd's PF firewall at our disposal, along with rebuilding
complete OS in one command, unlike linux people and their "reinstalls"
on any problems
On 03/09/2011 11:52, pollex wrote:
Hi, I want to know in your experience what is the best operating
system to run bind for an ISP. We currently have Debian for the 5
Cache servers and for the 2 Authoritative servers.
We have around 111851 success querys in the cache servers and around
7267 zones
Thanks guys, sounds like a solution would be to transfer the zone
files outside of bind. I'll give some of the suggestions a try.
Matt
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 PM, John Wobus wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Matt Rae wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'm working on setting up a slave dns server. Dots have
2011/3/10 Evan Hunt
>
> > Now DLZ supports dynamic updates and theoretically it is possible to
make
> > such tricks:
> >
> > rndc freeze example.com
> > put some new records in database
> > rndc thaw example.com
> > rndc sign example.com
> > rndc freeze example.com
> >
> > That is zone isn't reall
Op 10-03-11 18:26, Christian Laursen schreef:
> On 03/10/11 17:05, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> and hadn't even given any thought to to the problem of supporting DNSSEC,
>> but we can add those features to the roadmap as well if there's user demand.
>
> I just want to throw my vote for having DLZ support
Evan you looked into why a master in 9.8 will not respond as authoratative
for a dlz+mysql zone even though dig axfr zone from slave works
Dan.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Evan Hunt wrote:
Now DLZ supports dynamic updates and theoretically it is possible to make
such tricks:
rndc freeze exa
On 10/03/11 17:26, Christian Laursen wrote:
On 03/10/11 17:05, Evan Hunt wrote:
Incidentally, we've been expanding DLZ support further. In 9.8.1, the
dlopen driver will be part of the default build on unix/linux
platforms, no
longer requiring a configure option, so you can use the Samba module
On 03/10/11 17:05, Evan Hunt wrote:
Incidentally, we've been expanding DLZ support further. In 9.8.1, the
dlopen driver will be part of the default build on unix/linux platforms, no
longer requiring a configure option, so you can use the Samba module (or
other modules yet to be written) with a
> Now DLZ supports dynamic updates and theoretically it is possible to make
> such tricks:
>
> rndc freeze example.com
> put some new records in database
> rndc thaw example.com
> rndc sign example.com
> rndc freeze example.com
>
> That is zone isn't really dynamic, but it is dynamically loadable
Hello, List
Now DLZ supports dynamic updates and theoretically it is possible to make
such tricks:
rndc freeze example.com
put some new records in database
rndc thaw example.com
rndc sign example.com
rndc freeze example.com
That is zone isn't really dynamic, but it is dynamically loadable and
si
On 10 Mar 2011, at 08:44, Torinthiel wrote:
> Bujt the
> procedure still is same.
A solution (not necessarilty better) involving less typing
would be
dig +trace dnsbed.com ns
/Niall
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lis
Dnia 2011-03-10 09:53 terry napisał(a):
>Hello,
>
>How do I know that my name servers, ns1.dnsbed.com and
>ns2.dnsbed.com, have been registered in ICANN?
AFAIK ICANN does not run .com registry, VeriSign does.
But this doesn't change anything.
First, your nameservers will not be registered per
16 matches
Mail list logo