Re: Compromised BIND?

2011-06-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:59:08PM -0400, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote a message of 52 lines which said: Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Same problem for me. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently sorted, correct? On 31.05.11 12:27, Phil Mayers wrote: Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply with RFC 3484 policies in calls to getaddrinfo)

[OT] Re: Compromised BIND?

2011-06-01 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:59:08PM -0400, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote a message of 52 lines which said: Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Same problem for me. No wonder the list is slow if everyone send

Slow list [was: Re: Compromised BIND?]

2011-06-01 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Yes, very. [Pressing 's'end at 09:54 CET] -JP ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Maren S. Leizaola
On 5/31/2011 7:39 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: It is still a bad idea. Fixing the clients so they work well with multi-homed servers not only works today with mostly IPv4 servers but also works well with dual stack server and IPv6 only servers. You don't have to have artifially low TTLs on the DNS

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-06-01 Thread Phil Mayers
On 01/06/11 08:11, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently sorted, correct? On 31.05.11 12:27, Phil Mayers wrote: Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply

Re: Slow list [was: Re: Compromised BIND?]

2011-06-01 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow? Yes, very. [Pressing 's'end at 09:54 CET] I think it's moderated. Sending at 11:16 UTC. -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless /dev/rob0 or not-spam