-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> info : i am using bind 9.2.4 upon rhel4
If you want to upgrade to a newer version, you might try
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/util/bind-9.7.4-0.2.b1.fc14.src.rpm which was
slightly hacked from the Fedora rawhide version to build on
rhel4/centos4.
--
In message <936805.37724...@web161304.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, Ricardo Ide writes:
> remove me
Did you bother to follow the link at the end of the message you
replied to before posting this? The same one that will be at the
end of this message.
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
Are you starting named with -t ? If so you need to
look at the path relative to the .
Mark
In message , kshitij mali w
rites:
> --===0107398317155429819==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3033451dccf8a204a559ffe8
>
> --20cf3033451dccf8a204a559ffe8
> Content-Type:
Named really isn't designed to be a catch all server. It's designed
to serve the configured zones and only the configured zones. That
being said the later versions of named allow zones to be added via
rndc so the configuration effort required to add a new zone is much
lower.
e.g.
rndc a
In message <4df21e85.2020...@lcrcomputer.net>, Lyle Giese writes:
> On 06/10/11 07:53, David Sparro wrote:
> > On 6/10/2011 5:04 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
> >> HI All,
> >> I am repeated facing SERVFAIL error with respond to dig command .
> >> but when i dig to known domian like yahoo,gmail.orkut et
On 06/10/11 09:50, Per-Olof Axelsson wrote:
When I run the following dig command below I sometimes get different answers,
generally 20-30 minutes after restarting BIND.
It doesn't matter if I run dig from a remote host or locally on the problematic
DNS server.
The two servers in question run on
remove me!
From: Doug Barton
To: Phil Mayers
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Problem resolving CNAME in BIND 9.8.0 and 9.8.0-P2
On 6/10/2011 8:36 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> It was fixed in 9.8.1, or you can apply the
On 6/10/2011 8:36 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
It was fixed in 9.8.1, or you can apply the patch that the FreeBSD guys
have:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/dns/bind98/files/patch-bin__named__query.c?rev=1.1
I can't take credit for that, it came from Mark. :)
--
Nothin' ever do
Phil Mayers wrote:
>
> This might be the problem resolving CNAMEs that was discussed on the list
> recently:
>
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2011-May/thread.html#83714
>
> "Bind 9.8.0 intermittent problem with non-recursive responses"
>
> It was fixed in 9.8.1
But note that the cur
Hello,
I have a question about dnssec when zones are dynamically updated and
very time are changed for users.
KSK needs be stored in "key-directory"? I want to store in unmounted
volume and I will mount when is need.
P.S: I have some KSKs and ZSKs.
Thanks in advance,
Noel Rocha
___
On 07/06/11 13:51, I wrote:
I now have this situation on one Solaris 10 slave; the problem
probably also exists on the other Sol 10 slave and the two
Ubuntu hardy slaves:
The _tcp zone on the master MS DNS Server:
1238 600 86400 3600
The _tcp zone on the BIND 9.7.3-P1 Solaris 10 server di
On 10/06/11 15:50, Per-Olof Axelsson wrote:
When I run the following dig command below I sometimes get different
answers, generally 20-30 minutes after restarting BIND. It doesn't
This might be the problem resolving CNAMEs that was discussed on the
list recently:
https://lists.isc.org/piperm
When I run the following dig command below I sometimes get different answers,
generally 20-30 minutes after restarting BIND.
It doesn't matter if I run dig from a remote host or locally on the problematic
DNS server.
The two servers in question run on entirely different hardware and operating
sy
On Jun 10 2011, Adam Tkac wrote:
Hello Chris,
that was too short cut from ncache.c.
9.7.0* contains:
/*
* Copy the type to the buffer.
*/
isc_buffer_availableregion(&buffer,
&r);
if (r.length < 2)
On 06/10/11 07:53, David Sparro wrote:
On 6/10/2011 5:04 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
HI All,
I am repeated facing SERVFAIL error with respond to dig command .
but when i dig to known domian like yahoo,gmail.orkut etc then no
problem .
i think there is some perfomance issue with mycaching dns server
On 6/10/2011 5:04 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
HI All,
I am repeated facing SERVFAIL error with respond to dig command .
but when i dig to known domian like yahoo,gmail.orkut etc then no problem .
i think there is some perfomance issue with mycaching dns server how to
check the reson lookup failure
an
On 06/10/2011 01:45 PM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Jun 10 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> In message <201106100709.qaa04...@osspc4.sra.co.jp>, YABUKI Youichi
>> writes:
>>> The BIND security advisory for CVE-2011-1910 does not mention
>>> about versions 9.7.0, 9.7.0-P1 and 9.7.0-P2.
>>> Does the CVE
On Jun 10 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <201106100709.qaa04...@osspc4.sra.co.jp>, YABUKI Youichi writes:
The BIND security advisory for CVE-2011-1910 does not mention
about versions 9.7.0, 9.7.0-P1 and 9.7.0-P2.
Does the CVE-2011-1910 vulnerability affect these versions?
No, they are n
why bind unable to find log files where file is present at location with all
permisions
===
tail -f /var/log/messages
logging channel 'resolver_file' file '/var/log/resolver.log': file not found
==
[root@relay virusmails]# ls -l /var
Hello there,
I'm trying to configure BIND (BIND 9.7.3) as a "catchall" DNS server for a parking domain service. This is a way to let
users/clients park their domains automatically by pointing primary and secondary DNS servers there. It should work with ANY TLD
(both generic and countrycodes).
HI All,
I am repeated facing SERVFAIL error with respond to dig command .
but when i dig to known domian like yahoo,gmail.orkut etc then no problem .
i think there is some perfomance issue with mycaching dns server how to
check the reson lookup failure
and how to improve the preformance .
info
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:09:31PM +0900,
YABUKI Youichi wrote
a message of 7 lines which said:
> The BIND security advisory for CVE-2011-1910 does not mention about
> versions 9.7.0, 9.7.0-P1 and 9.7.0-P2.
9.7.0* is not supported, I believe. IF you use the 9.7 branch, you
should be in a late
In message <201106100709.qaa04...@osspc4.sra.co.jp>, YABUKI Youichi writes:
> The BIND security advisory for CVE-2011-1910 does not mention
> about versions 9.7.0, 9.7.0-P1 and 9.7.0-P2.
> Does the CVE-2011-1910 vulnerability affect these versions?
No, they are not affected.
> __
The BIND security advisory for CVE-2011-1910 does not mention
about versions 9.7.0, 9.7.0-P1 and 9.7.0-P2.
Does the CVE-2011-1910 vulnerability affect these versions?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
24 matches
Mail list logo
