Introduction
BIND 9.8.1b2 is the second beta release of BIND 9.8.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.8.0 to BIND 9.8.1b2.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete
list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software can alwa
2011/7/8 Kevin Darcy :
>
> I think it's worth emphasizing that in the first case, the contents of the
> Authority Section were *mandatory* (see RFC 2308, Negative Caching), whereas
> in the second case the authoritative nameserver was *optionally* providing
> NS records in the Authority Section. I
Introduction
BIND 9.4-ESV-R5rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.4-ESV-R5.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.4-ESV-R4 to BIND
9.4-ESV-R5rc1. Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release
for a complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest release
Introduction
BIND 9.7.4rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.7.4.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7.3 to BIND 9.7.4rc1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete
list of all changes.
Download
The latest version of BIND 9 software c
> I only saw this message when the key first became active, I haven't seen
> it since. However, based on your description, and given I'm always
> signing a fresh zone rather than resigning one, it seems I'd always see
> this message, as dnssec-signzone would never have an existing DNSKEY
> RRset to
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:56:57PM -0700, Evan Hunt wrote:
> Apparently it thought this was the first time it was being published,
> anyway. That information doesn't come from the publication date but
> from before-and-after comparison of the DNSKEY RRset.
>
> If this message came from dnssec-s
On 7/7/2011 1:50 AM, Torinthiel wrote:
On 07/07/11 04:56, pa...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello,
I got two different forms of AUTHORITY SECTION from the dig, for example,
$ dig mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
;<<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2.1<<>> mydots.net @ns7.dnsbed.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
So here is my question: How do I set up two servers (master/slave)
using views (for internal and external clients) so that both of them
hold the the correct data and return the correct answers to their
respective clients (inside and outside)?
Thanks much
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> So here is my question: How do I set up two servers (master/slave)
> using views (for internal and external clients) so that both of
> them hold the the correct data and return the correct answers to
> their respective clients (ins
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:24:22AM -0500, Brad Bendily wrote:
> I am glad to be able to answer an email on this list.
> I literally did this same thing 4 days ago and had the exact same
> problem.
> Here is the answer you seek:
>
> https://www.isc.org/faq/item/182
>
Bingo - that's exactly what I
I am glad to be able to answer an email on this list.
I literally did this same thing 4 days ago and had the exact same
problem.
Here is the answer you seek:
https://www.isc.org/faq/item/182
bb
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:
Hi,
I'm in the process of setting up two DNS-servers
(master/slave). Response of these servers should be different as to
where the queries come from (inside our network vs. external). For
this purpose I thought about using views.
Here's an excerpt from what I got in my named.conf:
Master-DNS:
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
