Re: Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-09 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/08/2011 05:11 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote: It should be possible to set up an authoritative-only name server so that it does not recurse for anyone [except perhaps itself], but still allow someone to get a full resolution of a name whose canonical name is elsewhere. IMHBUCO. Why? The

BIND 9.5 Stopped listening on SUN Solaris 10

2011-07-09 Thread TCPWave Customer Care
Hi BIND Users, In one of our customer sites, the DNS process was found running on multiple cache serversbut is was not responding to a dig @localhost. The named version is BIND 9.5.1-P2 with security fixes from BIND 9.5.2-P3. The named process was in a hung state. The recursive cache could not

Re: BIND 9.5 Stopped listening on SUN Solaris 10

2011-07-09 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/09/2011 10:26, TCPWave Customer Care wrote: Hi BIND Users, In one of our customer sites, the DNS process was found running on multiple cache serversbut is was not responding to a dig @localhost. The named version is BIND 9.5.1-P2 with security fixes from BIND 9.5.2-P3. FYI, this

Re: about AUTHORITY SECTION

2011-07-09 Thread SM
At 00:04 08-07-2011, Chris Buxton wrote: As for Kevin's assertion that the SOA record in the authority section is required for a negative response, this is also incorrect. RFC 2308 is a proposed standard, not a standard. Further, section 8 of this RFC does not say explicitly that an SOA must