On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For the first time my primary name server is not reporting any more
>
> client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX query (cache) './NS/IN' denied: 1 Time(s)
>
This is a DNS attacking.
Many DNS Servers are meeting this kind of attack each day here
On Aug 18, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> No but you're missing the point. I don't think the OP was and I certainly
> wasn't suggesting it should have done what he "meant" to do.
Nah, I was just referring you your 'If I typed "las" instead of "ls" on a
command line and found ou
Hi all,
For the first time my primary name server is not reporting any more
client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX query (cache) './NS/IN' denied: 1 Time(s)
I use authfail on it to insert any IP attempting to ssh in, and failing more
than three times.
I checked the current blocked IP address from the NS1
> No but you're missing the point. I don't think the OP was and I
> certainly wasn't suggesting it should have done what he "meant" to do.
> However, I DO think it should have errored out because it was invalid
> input. (That is to say unless you think negative numbers should be
> considered v
No but you're missing the point. I don't think the OP was and I certainly
wasn't suggesting it should have done what he "meant" to do. However, I DO
think it should have errored out because it was invalid input. (That is to
say unless you think negative numbers should be considered valid i
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> It was certainly a typo and a user error in that regard.
>
> However, he was suggesting it was bug because it should have rejected input
> of negative numbers and I'll have to say I agree with that viewpoint. If I
> typed "las" instead of
It was certainly a typo and a user error in that regard.
However, he was suggesting it was bug because it should have rejected input of
negative numbers and I'll have to say I agree with that viewpoint. If I typed
"las" instead of "ls" on a command line and found out that "las" meant "lose
al
On 17.08.11 14:31, Morgan Toal wrote:
I would like to clarify something. I have 14 locations each using a
private class c address, and a single dns server which I have just
moved from bind8 to bind9.
I am getting a lot of these:
Aug 17 13:33:13 mail2 named[18610]: client 192.168.16.3#55546: R
Frank Bulk wrote:
> Would be nice if the error output or log would indicate such failures.
Yes, indeed!
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: Variable 3 or 4, becoming northwest 4
or 5 later in Dogger. Slight, occasionally moderate in Forties an
9 matches
Mail list logo
