How to set it?
I know there is a workaround, but I hadn't been able to make it work...
I use bind 9.7.3.
Thanks,
Niccolò
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
2011/10/12 Niccolò Belli darkba...@linuxsystems.it:
How to set it?
I know there is a workaround, but I hadn't been able to make it work...
What have you tried so far?
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http://www.ardynet.com
http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Subject: CNAME record for the root of the domain
How to set it?
I know there is a workaround, but I hadn't been able to make it work...
I use bind 9.7.3.
Perhaps you mean DNAME?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2672.txt
On 10/12/2011 09:20 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Subject: CNAME record for the root of the domain
How to set it?
I know there is a workaround, but I hadn't been able to make it work...
I use bind 9.7.3.
Perhaps you mean DNAME?
How widely are
Il 12/10/2011 18:18, Rick Dicaire ha scritto:
What have you tried so far?
@ IN CNAME linuxsystems.it.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
What have you tried so far?
@ IN CNAME linuxsystems.it.
No CNAME and other data [1]. You have an SOA and NS at the apex, so a
CNAME isn't allowed.
-JP
[1] Until you start with DNSSEC :)
___
Please visit
Many years ago, various flavors of unix began distributing a
utility called host which did almost the same thing as nslookup.
Host is what I use most of the time, now, and I actually thought
that nslookup on unix systems was maybe going away.
A coworker recently asked me about nslookup on
One thing that is different about nslookup on HP-UX (which doesn't have host)
is that it actually respects nsswitch.conf so will give you results from
/etc/hosts OR from name services whereas most implementations only do it from
name services.
Nslookup is deprecated meaning you should use host
Martin wrote on 10/12/2011 01:21:45 PM:
Other than a different output format, what are the
advantages of having both host and nslookup.
host is four characters shorter.
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or
privileged
On 10/12/2011 1:21 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Many years ago, various flavors of unix began distributing a
utility called host which did almost the same thing as nslookup.
Host is what I use most of the time, now, and I actually thought
that nslookup on unix systems was maybe going away.
On 10/12/2011 3:01 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 10/12/2011 1:21 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Many years ago, various flavors of unix began distributing a
utility called host which did almost the same thing as nslookup.
Host is what I use most of the time, now, and I actually thought
that nslookup
So hitting yourself in the head with a shovel is better? :p
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:08 PM
To:
On 12/10/11 22:08, David Miller wrote:
On 10/12/2011 3:01 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 10/12/2011 1:21 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Many years ago, various flavors of unix began distributing a
utility called host which did almost the same thing as nslookup.
Host is what I use most of the time,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
Use dig.
Always use dig.
I don't quite agree, for debugging bind, use dig - for debugging lookup
issues on some machine, host will behave more like any normal program, using
resolv.conf and what else and can point to
On 12/10/11 22:33, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
Use dig.
Always use dig.
I don't quite agree, for debugging bind, use dig - for debugging lookup
issues on some machine, host will behave more like any normal program, using
On 10/12/2011 5:46 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
On 12/10/11 22:33, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Sten Carlsenst...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
Use dig.
Always use dig.
I don't quite agree, for debugging bind, use dig - for debugging lookup
issues on some machine, host will
AIX also does something similar.
On 10/12/11 05:09 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
As far as I know, only HP-UX has hacked nslookup to look at /etc/hosts.
And I don't think it even looks at the switch file or other naming
sources (e.g. Yellow Plague). HP-UX's nslookup enhancement is a
one-off, I
In message 040b89c8b1e1d945ae2700c511a039e905a...@atmexdb04.dsw.net, Lightne
r, Jeff writes:
One thing that is different about nslookup on HP-UX (which doesn't have host)
is that it actually respects nsswitch.conf so will give you results from /et
c/hosts OR from name services whereas most
18 matches
Mail list logo
