bind 9.9 inline-signing issue..

Well after the various discussion a short while back, I decided to give the inline-signing a run, and after setup I must say it did appear to do what I expected. Of course anything that went that easy had to have a snag, and it did, and at the moment I am wondering what I have missed so

Re: bind 9.9 inline-signing issue..

I agree with you. I took your example and installed bind 9.9.0b2 I also updated my 'soa' in the unsigned... Am getting the following in my log... Jan 29...: zone test1.co.za/IN (unsigned): loaded serial 2012012901 Jan 29...: zone test1.co.za/IN (signed): loaded serial 200105 (DNSSEC signed)

RE: bind 9.9 inline-signing issue..

After setting up a zone with DNSSEC using inline-signing, I have run into the issue where if I do anything that updates the unsigned file that is input into BIND, that it never seems to update the signed data it generated. As an example, I had serial number of 2012012701 in the test zone

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

Hi Peter Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in query-errors.log. But i am unable to log the NXDOMAIN error logs . Referring to Bind documentation, i enabled delegation-only

Re: Detailed Log Analysis based on rndc stats!!

In message canbtt6nxwb4fqygev4x8_jl+m5ho7wfenirxzg3pgvc-kzc...@mail.gmail.com , Shiva Raman writes: Hi Peter Thanks a lot for your reply. I had enabled query-errors with debug level 2 in my bind logging, now i am able to log all SERVFAIL related error logs in query-errors.log. But i am

Re: bind 9.9 inline-signing issue..

Slept on this. This morning 8+ hours later, no change. Added a completely new record to the (unsigned) zone, updated the SOA Serial and ran 'rndc reload': Jan 30 09...: received control channel command 'reload' Jan 30 09...: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf' ... Jan 30 09...: zone