Re: purpose of the RIR(for example RIPE) "domain:" object

2012-03-14 Thread Martin T
Ok, but still RIPE domain object is just an informational record? I mean DNS servers don't use RIPE domain object data, do they? So basically nothing happens if I don't create(or update) domain object in RIPE database when I delegate a zone file.. Martin Kuupäeval 20. detsember 2011 19:37 kirjut

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Mark Andrews
We believe this patch will fix this issue. It has been committed to be released as part of BIND 9.9.1. Mark diff --git a/bin/named/client.c b/bin/named/client.c index 2f4130c..ae13795 100644 --- a/bin/named/client.c +++ b/bin/named/client.c @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ ns_client_recursing(ns_client_t *c

Re: NS record for subzone definition

2012-03-14 Thread Casey Deccio
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:33 AM, hugo hugoo wrote: > Thanks for this interesting feedback. > Now I have the problem to detect this kind of bad configuration. > > If I have: > > Zone toto.be: > > toto.be. > > NS ns1.xxx.be > > + some records > > > Zone titi.toto.be: > > > titi.to

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Cathy Almond
On 14/03/12 10:11, Eivind Olsen wrote: >> In BIND 9.9.0(CentOS 4.6) >> >> Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: critical: client.c:318: >> INSIST(client->newstate <= 3) failed, back trace

Re: DNS requests error sending response: host unreachable

2012-03-14 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Romgo : All right. this seems to correct the issue. But that's the first time I had to open the firewall for a packet answer. weird. It is a somewhat special case. UDP by itself is not stateful at all so any stateful firewall have to use some timeout values to decide if the "co

Re: BIND 9.9.0 assertion failure

2012-03-14 Thread Eivind Olsen
> In BIND 9.9.0(CentOS 4.6) > > Mar 9 06:58:51 X named[17533]: general: critical: client.c:318: > INSIST(client->newstate <= 3) failed, back trace This looks like a crash I just had here,

Re:

2012-03-14 Thread Cathy Almond
On 13/03/12 20:46, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message , Daniel McDonald > writ > es: >> >> On 3/13/12 8:20 AM, "hugo hugoo" wrote: >> >>> ==> do I have to create in zone "toto.be" the following NS record: >>> >>> titi.toto.be. TTL IN NSns1.xxx.be >>> >>> >>> I ha