On 4/30/12 10:17 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
> The fact that you can ping them just means that you have a kernel
> bug.
Yeah, the bug is using Linux. ;-)
--
Don't worry about avoiding temptation -- as you grow older, it starts
avoiding you. -- The Old Farmer's Almanac
_
In message , michoski writes:
> On 4/30/12 4:14 PM, "Augie Schwer" wrote:
> > I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
> >
> > augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
> >
> > augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
> > lo:1 Link encap:Local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 07:13 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, please see my previous e-mail about the address
> being perfectly pingable on that interface.
>
Whats that have to do with anything? It being pingable only means
something is respo
On 4/30/12 4:14 PM, "Augie Schwer" wrote:
> I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
>
> augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
>
> augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 06:14 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
> I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
>
> augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
>
> augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
> lo:1 Link encap:L
On 4/30/2012 7:14 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
> I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
>
> augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
Netmask says what addresses are REACHABLE on that interface, not the
addresses assigned to that interface.
A
Thanks for the reply, please see my previous e-mail about the address
being perfectly pingable on that interface.
We run PowerDNS and Unbound with a similar interface configuration
without a problem, I'm sure Bind can too, I just need to know what the
special config. option I'm missing is.
Any he
On 4/30/12 2:56 PM, "Augie Schwer" wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
> seem that difficult.
>
> I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
>
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
This isn't a /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/30/2012 04:56 PM, Augie Schwer wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
> seem that difficult.
>
> I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
>
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet a
I think you've all missed the netmask there, 10.0.0.2 is in that range.
augie@augnix:~$ sudo ifconfig lo:1 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$ ifconfig lo:1
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
augie@augnix:~$ ping 10.0.0.2 -c 1
PING
cloud cache wrote:
>
> How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
> For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS server
> name.
Like this:
$ dig +noall +answer soa fanf2.ucam.org
fanf2.ucam.org. 3600IN SOA black.dotat.at. dot.dotat.at.
40 3
On 30/04/2012 23:56, Augie Schwer wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
> seem that difficult.
>
> I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
>
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
This means you'
Augie Schwer wrote:
>
> I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
>
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
>
> And I want to convince Bind to listen on sub-set of the given range (
> 10.0.0.2 for example )
You can't do that without hacki
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Augie Schwer wrote:
> I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
> seem that difficult.
>
> I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
>
> lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
>
> And I want
In message <2a078dfa10a22fe23c0ad67b92b58...@mail.mxes.net>, cloud cache writes:
> Hello,
>
> How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
> For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS
> server name.
>
> Thanks.
update add zone ttl SOA .
send
Just mak
Hello,
How to use nsupdate to dynamic update the SOA records?
For example, I want to update the zone's contact email and main NS
server name.
Thanks.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
b
I must be doing something wrong, because what I want to do doesn't
seem that difficult.
I have a range of IPs bound to a local interface:
lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:10.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.224
And I want to convince Bind to listen on sub-set of the given range (
1
On 30/4/12 13:56 , Chris Thompson wrote:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors-01
>>
>> Being actively discussed on DNSOP list
>
> It *was* being actively discussed there, up until about 10 days ago. Since
> then the participants seem to have stopped, maybe from
Operational Notification -- Segmentation Fault in resolver.c
Affects BIND 9.6-ESV-R6, 9.7.5, 9.8.2, & 9.9.0
Summary:
ISC has discovered a race condition in the resolver code that
can cause a recursive nameserver running BIND 9.6-ESV-R6, 9.7.5,
9.8.2, or 9.9.0 to crash with a segmentation
Hi,
I need information about how works max client per query and client
per query ?
I want to limit number query done by a client. The usage of
resources in my equipments is very high specially in my firewall.
I appreciate your help about this.
Saludos,
Atentamente,
Rafael J.
On Apr 30 2012, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
[...]
From a Comcast talk at SATIN 2012 I believe they called that a "negative
trust anchor", and IIRC, the author wanted to publish a draft of its
operation. Haven't seen it yet though, and it's probably of
21 matches
Mail list logo
