Dear all,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
== the zone titi.be is in the same server (A) but is not transferred to the
server
Hi,
I am testing with BIND 9.9.0 and inline signing. I have run upon
something that I cannot figure out. When I update the SOA record of the master
zone file, if I reload the zone with rndc reload, the SOA record is updated.
If I perform a stop/start of the named executable, the SOA
On 07/05/2012 15:29, hugo hugoo wrote:
Hi Hugo,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server
(A) to another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
== the zone titi.be is in the same server
If that's an exact copy of your record, I'm going to also assume that
the ORIGIN at the time of the record is toto.be. As such, the
resulting record becomes:
www.toto.be.toto.be. 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be.toto.be.
Note that trailing '.'s are required to prevent the automatic addition
of
On 5/7/12 8:29 AM, hugo hugoo hugo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
== the zone
When I update the SOA record of the master zone file, if I reload the zone
with rndc reload, the SOA record is updated. If I perform a stop/start of
the named executable, the SOA change is not updated.
Ralph: There was a lot of discussion about this issue on the bind forum around
the first
So ... if we have
exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
ns2.exacttarget.com
but we don't delegate s6 in the exacttarget.com zone file ... forgot to enter
it in the zone file ...
how is it
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
spa...@countryday.net wrote:
When I update the SOA record of the master zone file, if I reload the zone
with rndc reload, the SOA record is updated. If I perform a stop/start of
the named executable, the SOA change is not updated.
Ralph:
On 5/7/12 11:32 AM, M. Meadows sun-g...@live.com wrote:
So ... if we have
exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
ns2.exacttarget.com
but we don't delegate s6 in the exacttarget.com
You are getting lucky that they are on the same server and when asked
about anything in the subdomain the server notices it loads it and answers
for it. It is however a landmine waiting for someone in thee future. If
you move the subdomain to another server without fixing the delegation the
s6 is a subdomain of the parent domain. Unless otherwise specified,
subdomains are mastered (NS'd) by the parent (or extended parent domain)
containing NS records. As such, because you didn't put any NS records
in the zone file for s6, it follows the NS records of the parent which
happen to
Ralph: There was a lot of discussion about this issue on the bind forum
around the first of the year. My recollection is that with inline-signing
enabled, stopping named, editing the zone file, and restarting named
isn't a supported method of updating zone data.
That was unsupported in the
Hi Evan,
-Original Message-
From: Evan Hunt [mailto:e...@isc.org]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:44 PM
To: Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
Cc: Bischof, Ralph F. (MSFC-IS40)[NICS]; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Inline Signing does not update SOA?
Ralph: There was a lot of discussion
thanks for the feedback!
From: sun-g...@live.com
To: b...@wingenbach.org
Subject: RE: Why does a non-delegated sub-domain work?
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:44:38 -0400
Thanks for the feedback John.
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:23:30 -0400
From: b...@wingenbach.org
To:
Hi everyone-
Newbe here...
We have been running name servers using QDNS (Mac) for eons but now I want to
change that.
I still have NS1 (Master) set up and running with QDNS. It is also set to be
the master for NS2 so that shouldn't need changing (I hope, although NS1 is
running BIND 4.x and
On 5/7/12 1:02 PM, James Sheffer ja...@higherpowered.com wrote:
We have been running name servers using QDNS (Mac) for eons but now I want to
change that.
welcome to bind.
I still have NS1 (Master) set up and running with QDNS. It is also set to
be the master for NS2 so that shouldn't need
In message a605629600c9a347b5881ffe16f101fb3d82823...@ndmsscc07.ndc.nasa.gov,
Bischof, Ralph F. (MSFC-IS40)
[NICS] writes:
Hi,
I am testing with BIND 9.9.0 and inline signing. I have run upon
something that I cannot figure out. W
hen I update the SOA record of the master zone file,
Please add a Subject next time.
Please log a bug report with you Mail User Agent vendor that it is
doing unnessecary quoted-printable escaping. Comma does not need
to be escaped and as the purpose of quoted-printable is to be
readable by humans any unnecessary quoting should be avoided.
In
In article mailman.702.1336433477.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
michoski micho...@cisco.com wrote:
note: keeping replies on-list, so others can also chime in and help...
On 5/7/12 2:41 PM, James Sheffer ja...@higherpowered.com wrote:
My mistake - I thought allow-notify was telling the
On 5/7/12 5:57 PM, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
In article mailman.702.1336433477.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
michoski micho...@cisco.com wrote:
note: keeping replies on-list, so others can also chime in and help...
On 5/7/12 2:41 PM, James Sheffer ja...@higherpowered.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
