Hello
Is it possible with BIND to perform Single Type Signing Key rollover
as described in chapter 4.1.4 of rfc4641bis-11:
(The idea is to have zone with single key instead of ZSK/KSK pair)
There is a second variety of this rollover, during which one
introduces a new DNSKEY into the key
Can someone enlighten me on the following scenario
(I guess it's explained somewhere, but can't find the info.):
example.com was served by ns.OLDprovider.net
example.com owner wants to move his domain to ns.NEWprovider.net
oldprovider.net is not cooperating, and continues to serve
example.com
On 18/06/12 16:49, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
with each query gets new NS record, and... refreshes the NS TTL ?
No, that's not how TTLs work. They always count down.
Will ns.isp.com http://ns.isp.com EVER query ns.NEWprovider.net
http://ns.NEWprovider.net ?
Yes, when the TTL has expired.
Eventually, if you have done the parent delegations (through where you register
your zone) and have updated the new NS records to point only to the new spot,
the old zone will only be used by that provider, and nowhere else. So, if com
points to the new set of name servers, and example.com has
Did you update your whois information to point to the name servers at
NEWprovider.net?
After this change is made and any cached data expires, the world will
query them (NEWProvider), with the exception of anyone that uses name
servers at OLDprovider.net who still thinks they are authoritative
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
Can someone enlighten me on the following scenario
(I guess it's explained somewhere, but can't find the info.):
example.com was served by ns.OLDprovider.net
example.com owner wants to move his domain to ns.NEWprovider.net
oldprovider.net is not
Just to verify - when you say old provider you're just talking about
somewhere you had pointed your DNS records to and NOT the actual Registrar for
the domain?
If it is the Registrar you have to make changes at the Registrar's site to
change which DNS servers to use. If they're not being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2012 12:19 PM, Tom Diehl wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
Can someone enlighten me on the following scenario (I guess it's
explained somewhere, but can't find the info.):
example.com was served by
Hi Alexander,
We've actually run into this before. Once upon a time, RCN cable used
to run some slave servers for us, but we've long since moved away from
them, including zone transfers. We yanked them from our registrar a
long time ago, and life was good. For whatever reason, RCN's still
In message
CABUciRn0eVX5Gz8Ke0eLTHw0u0LnE9ExXX3s2zSPUKQP+3D3=a...@mail.gmail.com
, Alexander Gurvitz writes:
Hello
Is it possible with BIND to perform Single Type Signing Key rollover
as described in chapter 4.1.4 of rfc4641bis-11:
(The idea is to have zone with single key instead of
In message 4fdf5396.7000...@imperial.ac.uk, Phil Mayers writes:
On 18/06/12 16:49, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
with each query gets new NS record, and... refreshes the NS TTL ?
No, that's not how TTLs work. They always count down.
Which is because most for most queries there isn't a way to
In article mailman.1066.1340036045.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/06/12 16:49, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
with each query gets new NS record, and... refreshes the NS TTL ?
No, that's not how TTLs work. They always count down.
Didn't this
In message 4fdf631a.4060...@brandeis.edu, John Miller writes:
Hi Alexander,
We've actually run into this before. Once upon a time, RCN cable used
to run some slave servers for us, but we've long since moved away from
them, including zone transfers. We yanked them from our registrar a
In message barmar-aafd0c.23180418062...@news.eternal-september.org, Barry Mar
golin writes:
In article mailman.1066.1340036045.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18/06/12 16:49, Alexander Gurvitz wrote:
with each query gets new NS record,
In message barmar-1243ea.23293818062...@news.eternal-september.org, Barry Mar
golin writes:
In article mailman.1077.1340076168.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 4fdf631a.4060...@brandeis.edu, John Miller writes:
Hi Alexander,
We've
15 matches
Mail list logo