On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Sigh. It wouldn't be the
On 07/03/2012 01:16 AM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Are you sure about this?
From what I can see in
On 02/07/12 14:32, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
Dear Team,
My BIND DNS Server is crashing again and again.
I am getting these logs:
Jul 2 12:03:33 gaurav named[30523]: query.c:5379: INSIST(!is_zone) failed,
back trace
Jul 2 12:03:33 gaurav named[30523]: #0 0x805a7a5 in
As mentioned more than once on this list. Redhat starts with an upstream
version of a given package (say BIND 9.7) then backports security and bug fixes
from later upstream versions into theirs and add extended versioning (say
9.7-2.3.1). One would have to check Redhat's version to see what
Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote on 07/02/2012 06:40:51 PM:
The reason I'm running is that we're currently running the stock version
of BIND available with RHEL6. It's their policy to backport patches and
if there's a patch available then they may apply it faster rather than
deploying a new
Hi,
We run bind as caching only dns server for our customers.In logs, i can
see so many entries which tells
success resolving 'malayalam.samachar.com/A' (in '.'?) after disabling EDNS
success resolving 'm.sify.com/A' (in '.'?) after disabling EDNS
success resolving 'planetradiocity.com/A' (in
Ben benjo11...@gmail.com wrote:
We run bind as caching only dns server for our customers. In logs, i can
see so many entries which tells
success resolving 'x.y.z/A' (in '.'?) after disabling EDNS
How to check that current bind installation has EDNS enabled or ?
what could be reason behind
07/03/2012 01:16 AM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ...
It would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1.
Guess where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Are you sure about this?
From what I can see in
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:40:51 -0500
From: Oscar Ricardo Silva osc...@mail.utexas.edu
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind dies with assertion failure
Message-ID: 4ff22373.2000...@mail.utexas.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I may have
(Sorry, forgot to include the right Subject line so re-sending)
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:40:51 -0500
From: Oscar Ricardo Silva osc...@mail.utexas.edu
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind dies with assertion failure
Message-ID: 4ff22373.2000...@mail.utexas.edu
I disagree about this being off topic. It IS in fact a BIND question but like
many BIND implementations is specific to the user's setup.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On
While it's always better to compile and install from the latest
stable version, it's also nice to use their package management
system especially when you have to deal with multiple systems.
Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes
Jan-Piet wrote on 07/03/2012 10:41:20 AM:
Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
So far my plan was to copy the source directory to each server and
Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
Yes: use fpm. :)
So far my plan was to copy the source directory to each server and just
run make
On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:58 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
Jan-Piet wrote on 07/03/2012 10:41:20 AM:
Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
So far my
Thanks to all that replied. I think the solution I want to pursue is to
integrate AD 2012 DNS with BIND. Talk about bleeding edge huh??
From: Tony Finch d...@dotat.at
To: Marc Lampo marc.la...@eurid.eu
Cc: John Williams john.1...@yahoo.com;
Just giving a feedback, this method worked great, but in my case, didn't
have no negate the keys in the ACL (like the example below), I created one
key for each ACL in my configuration and used that ACL for the
match-clients directive in the view.
So, when the slave tried to sync the zone, the
If I run named-checkconf -z to check zones in my config, it will
report on success or failure of each zone, but will not specify which view.
If a zone name exists in more than one view, it will not indicate in which view
the failing zone is in.
This seems like this would be good information to
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:54:19PM +, Jack Tavares wrote:
If I run named-checkconf -z to check zones in my config, it will
report on success or failure of each zone, but will not specify which view.
If a zone name exists in more than one view, it will not indicate in which
view
the
19 matches
Mail list logo
