On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:18:20PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/13/2013 01:44 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
Haven't done it on RHEL/CentOS 6.x yet but in RHEL5 with the bind-chroot
installed I've always had:
/var/named/chroot as the jail for BIND.
/var/named/chroot/etc = Location of
Delving further into my challenges.
Right now I use Network Solutions as my registrar. Just never changes
as they were the only show in town back then.
But they don't seem to support DNSSEC protected domains, and even IPv6
glue records are special requests, it seems.
My registration is up
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:32:53PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My registration is up for renewal; it expires 4/6/13 so this is a
good time to move. But of course my domain is locked and I can't
see on NS account page how to change that.
Dyn can probably help you with how do get NetSol to
I personally like NameCheap. Cheap, and good documentation (that you can use
even if you go with someone else).
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moskowitz [mailto:r...@htt-consult.com]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 03:32 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
I am cross posting this as it might be a dns issue, but it effects email
directly. And I am quite aware of the 'Great Chinese Firewall' and
realized that may be a large part of the issue.
LCR's mail filter and mail servers are all in the lcrcomputer.net domain.
Recently I moved this
Hi--
On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
Recently I moved this domain(lcrcomputer.net) to a registrar that suports
DNSSEC and inserted the DS record for this domain. I checked DNSSEC via
http://dnsviz.net and http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com. Both show
DNSSEC is
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 16:07 -0600, Lyle Giese wrote:
Recently I moved this domain(lcrcomputer.net) to a registrar that
suports DNSSEC and inserted the DS record for this domain. I checked
DNSSEC via http://dnsviz.net and
http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com. Both show DNSSEC is
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Lyle Giese wrote:
I am cross posting this as it might be a dns issue, but it effects email
directly. And I am quite aware of the 'Great Chinese Firewall' and realized
that may be a large part of the issue.
LCR's mail filter and mail servers are all in the
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Right now I use Network Solutions as my registrar. Just never changes as they
were the only show in town back then.
But they don't seem to support DNSSEC protected domains, and even IPv6 glue
records are special requests, it seems.
Have a look
Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
Recently I moved this domain(lcrcomputer.net) to a registrar that suports
DNSSEC and inserted the DS record for this domain.
Was it signed before this point? I am wondering if this is a DNS response
size problem - was the cause the addition of the DS
On 02/18/13 19:02, Tony Finch wrote:
Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
Recently I moved this domain(lcrcomputer.net) to a registrar that suports
DNSSEC and inserted the DS record for this domain.
Was it signed before this point? I am wondering if this is a DNS response
size problem - was
I see no problem with your SPF IP records though so long as you dont try
use ns1. Ignoring most of Vernons anti SPF rhetoric, which BTW this
list is NOT the place for (go cry a river on mailop list), he is
correct that you shouldn't really be using PTR, or A for that mater,
just have your
On Feb 18, 2013, at 15.32, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Delving further into my challenges.
Right now I use Network Solutions as my registrar. Just never changes as
they were the only show in town back then.
But they don't seem to support DNSSEC protected domains, and
apparently you have no comprehension of OFF TOPIC
I stopped reading at about the half dozen words because you once again
went off on your OFF TOPIC rants.
But each to our own, you hate it, many stand by it, its only fools like
you who cant accept that, thats your problem not mine.
Given that
Moving registration away from NetSol is documented at
http://www.networksolutions.com/support/preparing-a-domain-name-for-a-transfer-out-of-network-solutions/
If you have a good number of domains, and that number changes frequently, you
might want to consider CSC
On 19.02.13 10:25, Noel Butler wrote:
One thing I need to point out, your SOA timings seem extreme...
refresh 86400 drop that to 3h
retry 3600, drop to 900
I don't see the reason for doing these, unless NOTIFY does not work, but in
such case it's the NOTIFY that should be fixed...
expire
16 matches
Mail list logo