Thank you Cathy already informed me of that. it works with the patch.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jr...@isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:20 PM
To: Paul A
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: caps compiling error
Please see
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-010
The nsdiff program examines the old and new versions of a DNS zone, and
outputs the differences as a script for use by BIND's nsupdate program. It
provides a bridge between static zone files and dynamic updates. If you
use BIND 9.7 or 9.8, you can use nsdiff as an alternative to the DNSSEC
inline-s
In article ,
Agustín Dixan Díaz Corrales wrote:
> El 26/11/13 11:09, /dev/rob0 escribió:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:38:44AM -0500, Agustín Dixan Díaz Corrales wrote:
> >> solved!
> >
> > No, not solved ...
> >
> >> dnssec-enable no;
> >> dnssec-validation no;
> >
> > ... That's a workaround,
Cathy, thank you that worked on 9.9.4.
Thanks for your help, paul.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+razor=meganet@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+razor=meganet@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Cathy Almond
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:08 PM
To: bind-users@l
Please see
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01060/0/Building-BIND-9.9.4-9.8.6-and-9.6-ESV-R10-on-RHEL-and-CentOS-with-libcap-dev-installed.html
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users ma
On 26/11/2013 16:56, Paul A wrote:
> Yeah I have compline Bind on that machine many times currently I'm on BIND
> 9.8.4-P2.
>
> Not sure what header file is missing.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+razor=meganet@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+razor=megane
Yeah I have compline Bind on that machine many times currently I'm on BIND
9.8.4-P2.
Not sure what header file is missing.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+razor=meganet@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+razor=meganet@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
/dev/rob0
Sent: T
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:17:11AM -0500, Paul A wrote:
> I was trying to upgrade BIND and suddenly ran into this error with
> both version of bind I was upgrading to.
>
> I tried to compile, bind-9.9.4 and bind-9.8.6-P1 and I get a caps
> error, I search the mailing archives and the web but did
El 26/11/13 11:09, /dev/rob0 escribió:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:38:44AM -0500, Agustín Dixan Díaz Corrales wrote:
solved!
No, not solved ...
dnssec-enable no;
dnssec-validation no;
... That's a workaround, not a solution. If you read up on the
reasons for DNSSEC, you'll understand that y
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:38:44AM -0500, Agustín Dixan Díaz Corrales wrote:
> solved!
No, not solved ...
> dnssec-enable no;
> dnssec-validation no;
... That's a workaround, not a solution. If you read up on the
reasons for DNSSEC, you'll understand that you have fixed this
problem by opening
I was trying to upgrade BIND and suddenly ran into this error with both
version of bind I was upgrading to.
I tried to compile, bind-9.9.4 and bind-9.8.6-P1 and I get a caps error, I
search the mailing archives and the web but didn't find much on this. As
anyone run into this and know what I'm
solved!
dnssec-enable no;
dnssec-validation no;
any way thanks
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/
hi list, looking a syslog a bind9 log i note these:
error (no valid DS) resolving 'www.domain.cu/A/IN': ISP_IP_DNS#53
when i try to access from my localnet to any place of this domain
(www.domain.cu), bind dont resolv the consultthe forward dns ip from
my isp are declared but in specific ra
Mark,
Good point, I'd completely forgotten the value of a shorter
TTL record for cases like this.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:56:45AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
>
> , =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIENoLg==?= writes:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I would like to write script that change two entry in
On 26.11.13 07:10, Kumar, Naveen, Vodafone Group wrote:
If your target server has tcp port, you can create SRV record, DNS server
will do the healthcheck and failover accordingly.
No. SRV will only apply for services that use SRV records.
That does not include mail nor DNS services.
--
Matus
On 25/11/13 22:46, Listas wrote:
On 25-11-2013 15:42, Phil Mayers wrote:
2. Put a proper zone cut (delegation) into your local master,
pointing at your authoritative server
Thanks Phil. Your help has been valuable.
I think this is exactly what I'm doing here:
As Barry pointed out: no. This
16 matches
Mail list logo
