Hi,
This is example.com zone
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 86400 ; 1 day
example.com 86400 IN SOA ns.example.com. hostmaster.example.com.
(
2013122402 ; serial
86400 ; refresh (1 day)
7200
On Aug 28 2014, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/27/14 3:03 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
So you really meant that validating resolvers should only consult DLV if
their administrator knows that users are looking-up names that are in
the DLV? That's how I read your advice.
You're correct.
I don't see how
On 27-Aug-14 20:35, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/27/14 3:03 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
So you really meant that validating resolvers should only consult DLV if
their administrator knows that users are looking-up names that are in
the DLV? That's how I read your advice.
You're correct.
I don't see
On 8/28/14 10:55 AM, Timothe Litt wrote:
Aside from the use of the word 'absurdity', I'm not offended. I am
trying to educate. And while I recognize that I'm arguing
pragmatism with a market purist,
It's nice to be called pure, in some context anyway. :) However as I
pointed out I'm not
The next node to be signed is based on RRSIG expire times.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
Please visit
Hi Mark
If there are many RRSIGs expire at the same time, Which record will be
chosen?
Sincerely,
Mr.Jittinan Suwanrueangsri
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 5:36 AM
To: Jittinan Suwanruengsri
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject:
In message 102153bef555e7489ca5d54165c431a30139d...@exchbsi02.ttt.co.th, Jit
tinan Suwanruengsri writes:
Hi Mark
If there are many RRSIGs expire at the same time, Which record will be
chosen?
Any of them. It does not matter. Named just uses it as a triggering
record.
Sincerely,
7 matches
Mail list logo
