In article mailman.1035.1412133286.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Eli Heady eli.he...@gmail.com wrote:
With response sizes growing (dnssec, ipv6), answers are more likely to be
too large for UDP.
That's unlikely. That's why EDNS was created, so that these large
answers wouldn't require TCP.
On 10/1/14 8:17 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.1035.1412133286.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Eli Heady eli.he...@gmail.com wrote:
With response sizes growing (dnssec, ipv6), answers are more likely to be
too large for UDP.
That's unlikely. That's why EDNS was created, so
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Diagnostic help part 2
On 10/1/14 8:17 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article
Mike Hoskins (michoski) micho...@cisco.com wrote:
This isn't even specific to DNS...for example, there was a time when just
turning on what sounds good for cisco, netscreen and even checkpoint
would break other things like ESMTP.
You mean Cisco have fixed the grossly damaging bugs in the
If you would be so kind as to run the nmap test again from your location and
let me know if you're seeing the correct - or at least *more* correct
answers, I'd appreciate it.
Bill,
It looks good now.
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-10-01 12:47 MST
Nmap scan report for
In message 5D9044356DCF9341A7D1CDAE12FC601C2976D2A5@exch10-mb2.ccbill-hq.local
, John Anderson writes:
If you would be so kind as to run the nmap test again from your location and
let me know if you're seeing the correct - or at least *more* correct answe
rs, I'd appreciate it.
Bill,
It
Thanks! That cleared up a number of problems.
Now to tackle some of the others...
On 10/1/14, 2:51 PM, John Anderson wrote:
If you would be so kind as to run the nmap test again from your location and let
me know if you're seeing the correct - or at least *more* correct answers, I'd
On 2014-10-02 01:03, Mark Andrews wrote:
TCP has always been required for DNS except in very special
circumstances. Go read RFC 1123. Go look at the definition of
SHOULD. Unless you really knew what you were doing TCP as always
been expected to be ON.
Some people refuse to enable stuff
8 matches
Mail list logo
