ipv6 AAAA register and ipv4 NS register with the same name

Hello, We have bind 9.8.4. P2 with many registers delegated to Link load balancer (we have two public ip´s range and linkproof acts as a dns balancer). Now we need to add the ipv6 register for all those registers that are in ipv4 delegated to the link balancer but this balancer doesn´t

Re: ipv6 AAAA register and ipv4 NS register with the same name

In article mailman.1278.1418632708.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Manuel Ramírez manuel.rami...@grupoica.com wrote: Hello, We have bind 9.8.4. P2 with many registers delegated to Link load balancer (we have two public ip´s range and linkproof acts as a dns balancer). Now we need to add

Re: ipv6 AAAA register and ipv4 NS register with the same name

On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:38 AM, Manuel Ramírez manuel.rami...@grupoica.com wrote: Hello, We have bind 9.8.4. P2 with many registers delegated to Link load balancer (we have two public ip´s range and linkproof acts as a dns balancer). Now we need to add the ipv6 register for all

[question] new bind option max-recursion-depth

Hi, Bind-user folks, I have a question, about Vulnerability CVE-2014-8500 new bind option max-recursion-depth, I do not know this option meaning. I read ARM Documents I used Bind Version is 9.9.6-P1. -- max-recursion-depth Sets the maximum number of levels of

Re: ipv6 AAAA register and ipv4 NS register with the same name

In article mailman.1280.1418684210.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Chris Buxton cli...@buxtonfamily.us wrote: It sounds like you might want different addresses in the additional section of the response depending on whether the request for for an A record or a record. If so, that's not

Re: [question] new bind option max-recursion-depth

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:13:17AM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: But, max-recursion-depth, However, it tried but it did not become a Servfail. Meaning of is is Indirections is described in the document, it means that when the authority server that does not come directly returns the IP address,