> On 17/11/2016 10:20, LEE SUKMOON wrote:
>
> > I want to response NXDOMAIN.
> > Is it a solution this case?
>
> You'd usually get SERVFAIL from the recursor because the domain is
> misconfigured with a lame delegation, and either way the client won't
> get an answer.
>
> Is there a particular r
On 17/11/2016 10:20, LEE SUKMOON wrote:
> I want to response NXDOMAIN.
> Is it a solution this case?
You'd usually get SERVFAIL from the recursor because the domain is
misconfigured with a lame delegation, and either way the client won't
get an answer.
Is there a particular reason that the exact
Hi all.
I am using RPZ zone.
Below line is rpz zone file. But jifr.net is not working.
jifr.netCNAME .
*.jifr.net CNAME .
Unusual, this domain is responding with refused rcode. (from authority name
server)
$ dig @173.245.58.51 jifr.net
;;
In message <1479332234.30976.34.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com>, Carl Byington writes
:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 07:47 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I know you think doing this collectively is a service but having
> > individuals discover and complain to the site operators that their
> > DNS is broken i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 07:47 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I know you think doing this collectively is a service but having
> individuals discover and complain to the site operators that their
> DNS is broken is the only way there will be enough presur
> I'm trying to add zone of type "forward" with rndc addzone, but it fails with:
Unfortunately that's not currently possible. The configuration syntax is
misleading here. You configure forwarding in a view by putting a "zone"
statement in named.conf, but it doesn't actually build a zone *object*,
I know you think doing this collectively is a service but having
individuals discover and complain to the site operators that their
DNS is broken is the only way there will be enough presure brought
to bear for some of these companies to fix their server configurations.
It requires noise for them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Now that bind is sending cookies by default, there are some broken
servers out there that we need to configure with send-cookie no;.
Unless I am missing something, 9.11.0-P1 will (by default) fail to
resolve names like airdownload.wip4.adobe.com.
I
Emil Natan wrote:
>
> I also compiled BIND 9.11.0rc3, but nothing changed, no more verbosity,
> only the name of the .nzf file created changed from hash to plain text.
Try 9.11.0-P1 which has a few changes since rc3.
> Another finding is that the failure .nzf file is created, but it's empty
> an
Original Message
Subject: Re: rndc addzone type forward
Local Time: November 16, 2016 5:50 PM
UTC Time: November 16, 2016 3:50 PM
From: e...@foowatch.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Original Message
Subject: Re: rndc addzone type forward
Local Time: Nov
Original Message
Subject: Re: rndc addzone type forward
Local Time: November 16, 2016 5:12 PM
UTC Time: November 16, 2016 3:12 PM
From: d...@dotat.at
To: Emil Natan
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Emil Natan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add zone of type "forward" with rndc addzone, but i
Emil Natan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add zone of type "forward" with rndc addzone, but it fails with:
>
> rndc addzone zone.org '{type forward; forward only; forwarders {
> 192.168.20.115; }; };'
> rndc: 'addzone' failed: not found
I think this happens if you are using a version before 9.11 (whic
Hello,
I'm trying to add zone of type "forward" with rndc addzone, but it fails with:
rndc addzone zone.org '{type forward; forward only; forwarders {
192.168.20.115; }; };'
rndc: 'addzone' failed: not found
I have allow-new-zones set to yes in named.conf. Loading zones of type master
works f
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Voigt, Thomas
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to create some statistics for our BIND resolvers here. One of the
> measures is the number of unique ip addresses per day which are querying
> our resolvers.
>
> I've already checked "rndc stats" output as well as BIND's X
Hi all,
I need to create some statistics for our BIND resolvers here. One of the
measures is the number of unique ip addresses per day which are querying our
resolvers.
I've already checked "rndc stats" output as well as BIND's XML statistics
channels. But I didn't found any value that satisfi
15 matches
Mail list logo