Hello Anand / Tony
On 02/04/2019 20.25, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On 02/04/2019 17:12, Tony Finch wrote:
Hi Tony,
I have not noticed these errors on my toy server. I had a look at the code
and I thought Stephan's explanation was correct. My guess is that he is
starting named without root
On 02/04/2019 17:12, Tony Finch wrote:
Hi Tony,
> I have not noticed these errors on my toy server. I had a look at the code
> and I thought Stephan's explanation was correct. My guess is that he is
> starting named without root privileges, so it is unable to switch back and
> forth between
On 4/2/19 6:00 PM, Sam Wilson wrote:
>> During a cleanup of other code (specifically named-checkconf), code was
>> changed that enforced what was believed to have been the default
>> previously: specifically, allow-update was only allowed in zone stanzas.
>
> Can I ask who believed it was
On 2019-03-17 20:37:56 +, Alan Clegg said:
On 3/17/19 2:51 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 3/17/19 7:13 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Hello all,
I am using "BIND 9.13.7 (Development Release) " on arch linux. Up
to few days ago everything was fine using "certbot renew". I had
"allow-update"
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why it's doing that, but I think I know the reason for this
> error message. The release notes of 9.14.0 say that on Linux, BIND uses
> libcap to set certain privileges. However, if the /usr/sbin/named binary
> is not marked as being able to use privileges,
On 28/03/2019 14:40, Gasoo wrote:
Hi Stephan,
> Mar 25 16:41:56 dnsserver named[1348]: unable to set effective uid to 0:
> Operation not permitted
[snip]
> Why does named want to set the uid of itself back to 0?
> Has anyone seen this as well?
I'm not sure why it's doing that, but I think I
6 matches
Mail list logo
