-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAl3VnVMACgkQL6j7milTFsGv4ACfZBdGLuzuSS+5n1+yU4XGlH3u
The cache shows you that the forwarder reported that there’s no such record
returned from the upstream resolvers.
The NXRRSET means - Non-eXistant Resource Record Set, e.g. your resolvers
cached the non-existence of the name returned from the upstream resolvers.
The other option would be
Hello Ondřej
Many thanks for your answer. Hope debugging can help me without server
overloading.
They have around 1500 queries/s peakload during eveninghours. It will
need some time to log exactly this effect.
At the moment I have the following lines disabled:
// forwarders {
//
Thank you very much, this did the trick.
Have a nice day!
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
mail-list-us...@materna.de wrote:
>
> server 127.0.0.1
> debug no
> zone testoverride
> update add zzz.google.de 604800 A 127.0.0.1
> send
The problem is that nsupdate needs fully-qualified domain names - you
can't omit the zone name like you can in zone files. So your script needs
to be
zone
Hello,
I try to update my RPZ Zone 'testoverride' with nsupdate.
Sadly I get only
127.0.0.1#56851: view public: updating zone 'testoverride/IN': update failed:
update RR is outside zone (NOTZONE)
as error message.
How do I update a RPZ zone with nsupdate? Do I miss something? Do I understand
Hi,
you mentioned “forwarders” - what are these and how does answer look like
on the upstream forwarders?
I would recommend enabling higher debug level (start with -d 1) and look into
logs what was the answer from the forwarders preceding the failure.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC
> On 20
Hello list
I'm glad there is such an active list. Hope there is anybody out there
who can help me with my little problem. :-)
We are running six bind server ( all Ubuntu LTS 18.04 with bind 9.11.3
), so they are pretty up to date.
Three of them have authoritative zones, one is for testing and two
Am 19.11.19 um 18:23 schrieb John Thurston:
A) Should I expect these file permissions be altered by a minor update?
I know I started at 9.11.8 and have updated to 9.11.9 and 9.11.10
without seeing this behavior.
On 11/19/2019 8:34 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
yes, every by a package owned
9 matches
Mail list logo
