Hi,
Keen to know if rndc addzone functionality can be used to add zones in bind
serving response-policy? If so then what would be my view? Do I need to
define my view to make it work?
I tried this and its failing hence wondering if rndc can be used to add
zone or delete zone on the fly?
Here is
This is where we need to get the registrars to follow standards. They are
written
so everyone doesn’t have to cobble together ad-hoc solutions. Hourly scans of
all
the DNSSEC delegations by the registrars would do.
Personally I prefer push solutions but I couldn’t get the IETF to agree.
https:
> On 27 May 2020, at 07:27, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article you write:
>> What's the best way to force an A query via UDP to return a TC=1 result:
>> a really long CNAME chain?
>
> I'd suggest lots of records. You could do it with A records but you'd
> need four times as many
Well ~2
In article you write:
>What's the best way to force an A query via UDP to return a TC=1 result:
>a really long CNAME chain?
I'd suggest lots of records. You could do it with A records but you'd
need four times as many
$ dig wordy.examp1e.com
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
; <<>>
What's the best way to force an A query via UDP to return a TC=1 result:
a really long CNAME chain?
I want to set up a name that can be used in e.g. ping to perform an end
to end resolution check in application context.
The longer version is that there was a thread on postfix-users not too
long
I am told from my Splunk experts that the vendor supplied Splunk app for
isc-bind matches the BIND 9.8 version used in RHEL6, but not the BIND 9.11
version using in RHEL7. I have a mix now. Does anyone have a REGEX for
9.11, or better yet, a regex that matches both formats?
--
Bob Harold
__
i'm migrating/implementing the new `dnssec-policy` usage & KASP workflow in my
bind 9.16.3.
the new policy does a nice job of streamlining the signing/key mgmt.
after key generation/rotation, the 'last step' is submitting new/changed DS
Records to the relevant registrar
i'd like to automate th
On 26.05.20 11:38, Ingeborg Hellemo wrote:
If I do a full 'rndc reload' I finally get an error:
May 26 11:08:14 ludvigsen named[25953]: unable to create dispatch for reserved
port 129.242.5.254#53: permission denied
Since this is a host with serveral virtual interfaces this address/port is set
ond...@isc.org said:
> please see release notes:
> https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.3/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.16.3.html
Thank you!
Time to check my eyes (and renew my google search engine membership) since I
should have been able to find that myself.
--Ingeborg
--
Ingeborg Østrem H
> please see release notes:
>
> https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.3/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.16.3.html
>
> This is listed in Known Issues for BIND 9.16.1:
>
>> • UDP network ports used for listening can no longer simultaneously be
>> used for sending traffic. An example configuration wh
Hi Ingeborg,
please see release notes:
https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.3/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.16.3.html
This is listed in Known Issues for BIND 9.16.1:
> • UDP network ports used for listening can no longer simultaneously be
> used for sending traffic. An example configuration w
FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3
This morning I upgraded from BIND 9.14.11 to 9.16.3 via FreeBSD ports.
Then I realize that my slave server no longer transfer zones from the master.
The zone transfers worked as expected before the upgrade.
There are no error messages. The slave receives notifies from th
> contrib/README says that dlz/drivers are the old style dlz support,
> and one should use dlz/modules.
Correct.
The modules in contrib/dlz/modules are loaded at runtime. Since they're
dynamically linked, you don't have to link them into named at compile
time, so configure doesn't know about them
13 matches
Mail list logo
