> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:33, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>
> Hai all,
>
> We have been given task of doing some migrations within new merger.
> One of these is we have a number of reverse zones, a /19 in fact, they are
> mostly GENERATE'd for regions with fixed gw and a few other local custom PTRs
On 10/21/21 1:33 AM, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
Hai all,
Hi,
One of these is we have a number of reverse zones, a /19 in fact, they
are mostly GENERATE'd for regions with fixed gw and a few other local
custom PTRs
So 32 x /24s. Annoying, but not terrible to work with.
In our examples I have
Hello,
As part of our policy of pre-notification of upcoming security releases,
we are writing to inform you that the October 2021 BIND maintenance
releases that will be released on Wednesday, 27 October, will contain a
patch for a security vulnerability affecting the BIND 9.11.x, 9.16.x and
Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>
> I guess bind can not consolidate like this and we have to put up with a
> million /24 zone files ? I was thinking because we can do classless dele
> with smaller than /24, it would work on bigger :)
It is possible! The basic idea (very briefly) is:
With classless reve
Hai all,
We have been given task of doing some migrations within new merger.
One of these is we have a number of reverse zones, a /19 in fact, they are
mostly GENERATE'd for regions with fixed gw and a few other local custom
PTRs
I have played roughly with a fictitious in-addr.arpa (I play with
5 matches
Mail list logo