On 04/01/2022 21:12, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
Yep. This is where I have settled. But I don't feel I can defend
it when asked. Hence my seeking to better understand.
There are categories of bugs that specifically affect recursion, and in
BIND these are _much_ more common than
On 1/4/22 4:37 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
Better yet, use BIND's mirror zones feature so that the zone is also
DNSSEC validated.
Completely agreed. I think the type of authoritative information is
somewhat independent of the fact that any authoritative information exists.
IMHO, the strictures
On 04/01/2022 16:53, Mik J via bind-users wrote:
Hello,
How can I check which variables are loaded in memory and considered as
active.
For example, I would like to check that the value of lame-ttl is 0
In my named.conf configuration file I have
include "myconf.conf";
lame-ttl 600;
And in
Hello,
How can I check which variables are loaded in memory and considered as active.
For example, I would like to check that the value of lame-ttl is 0In my
named.conf configuration file I haveinclude "myconf.conf";
lame-ttl 600;
And in the myconf.conf file I havelame-ttl 0;
So how can I make
On 04/01/2022 03:52, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
If I'm allowing recursion and authoritative on the same server, I'd have
the recursive + authoritative server do secondary zone transfers off of
the internal MS-DNS / AD server. That way the clients can get the info
off of the first
5 matches
Mail list logo
