Hi,
in line with out deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list about our
preliminary
intent to deprecate the definition of the source ports and rely on the
operating system
to provide reasonable ephemeral port range for outgoing UDP and TCP connections.
Specifying outgoing ports is a
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:25:10PM -0500, Bob McDonald wrote:
> Thanks Evan and Ondrej. I'll let the folks at FreeBSD know also. Their
> bind packages still include that file.
The file itself is harmless. But we used to say it was best practice to
check for updates at the ISC website before
Thanks Evan and Ondrej. I'll let the folks at FreeBSD know also. Their
bind packages still include that file.
Bob
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023, 14:59 Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:33:46AM -0500, Bob McDonald wrote:
> > I've upgraded to bind 9.16.36.
> >
> > I went to the ISC site and
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:33:46AM -0500, Bob McDonald wrote:
> I've upgraded to bind 9.16.36.
>
> I went to the ISC site and picked up the bind.keys file.
>
> However, it is intended for use in bind 9.11 and contains the managed-keys
> clause. This throws an error in the syslog messages during
Bruce Johnson via bind-users wrote:-
>Were making an O365 tenant switchover for our domain (a subdomain of the
>arizona.edu domain) and moving from our Barracuda cloud email SMTP to the
>Universitys tenant, but email cannot flow until the Arizona.edu O365 tenant
>can take over our email
Bruce, I would push back and ask for more information from whomever is
leading you down that path as it does not sound right to me although others
more familiar with DNS magic might have better suggestions to DNS changes.
But if Barracuda is just a front-end for email that does antivirus/spam
SMTP is a wonderful protocol that queues messages and retries delivery for 5
days so a non-responsive email server is no issue.
Just do not have a temporary solution that bounces emails since those will
never arrive (the sender is notified about the bounce).
Marcus
On 03/01/2023 21:31, Bruce
Hi E R.
My short answer would be, don't configure views unless you have a good use
case for them. For example you are running resolvers that have two
different kinds of clients that need to be handled differently - one client
set needs RPZ, the other doesn't. Or something like that.
BIND has
8 matches
Mail list logo
